The same CDC numbers that showed that natural immunity is better than the vaccine, showed that vaccine and natural immunity is the same or maybe a hair's breadth better.
That's if you get infected first. The order makes a difference. OAS is the problem with training the immune system against the shots first, as opposed to the broad package of the virus itself.
Even then the 'hair's breadth' bit was their spin to try and persuade the least appropriate people to go and get jabbed when it was specifically not needed.
It depends. Natural immunity is much better than vaxx against later variants, because those variants evolved to defeat the vaxx. There is a wider disparity there.
Natural immunity is also far longer lasting. Vaxx shots lose effectiveness very quickly, which is why the government pushes for lots of boosters.
Vaxx shots lose effectiveness very quickly, which is why the government pushes for lots of boosters.
I feel like you're being generous here. With how ineffective the alleged vaccines are, who's to say they gave any protection in the first place? The whole "protection wears off" thing feels more like CYA for a product that never actually worked in the first place.
This is a conclusion that gains weight the more they try to rewrite recent history too,such as 'they were never meant to prevent infection'. Another one I've seen is 'Delta was devastating to the unvaccinated'. Anyone watching the stats in mid 2021 knows that Delta was the start of the jabs being irrefutably useless, but there's a narrative trying to form around the idea that they only started failing against Omicron.
You are assuming a static virus-host interaction. It's not a static system, it's dynamic. The virus is evolving to escape vaccine-induced immunity because that immunity is narrow and very similar across all vaccinated individuals. Newer variants are better at infecting and reinfecting vaccinated individuals. These individuals are poorly able to improve their immunity due to immune imprinting/OAS.
The same CDC numbers that showed that natural immunity is better than the vaccine, showed that vaccine and natural immunity is the same or maybe a hair's breadth better.
That's if you get infected first. The order makes a difference. OAS is the problem with training the immune system against the shots first, as opposed to the broad package of the virus itself.
Even then the 'hair's breadth' bit was their spin to try and persuade the least appropriate people to go and get jabbed when it was specifically not needed.
Are these the numbers from Pfizer? Was that before or after they deliberately destroyed their own control group?
Your blind spot for the clot shots is honestly embarrassing.
Not sure what is so confusing. I said 'CDC', not Pfizer.
A little bit of objectivity wouldn't hurt you, you know.
Look at Walgreens data. The more shots you have, the more likely you are to test positive.
It depends. Natural immunity is much better than vaxx against later variants, because those variants evolved to defeat the vaxx. There is a wider disparity there.
Natural immunity is also far longer lasting. Vaxx shots lose effectiveness very quickly, which is why the government pushes for lots of boosters.
Write up on some studies about how natural immunity is better here: https://intellectualtakeout.org/2022/07/study-natural-immunity-offered-more-protection-against-omicron-than-three-vaccine-doses/
I feel like you're being generous here. With how ineffective the alleged vaccines are, who's to say they gave any protection in the first place? The whole "protection wears off" thing feels more like CYA for a product that never actually worked in the first place.
This is a conclusion that gains weight the more they try to rewrite recent history too,such as 'they were never meant to prevent infection'. Another one I've seen is 'Delta was devastating to the unvaccinated'. Anyone watching the stats in mid 2021 knows that Delta was the start of the jabs being irrefutably useless, but there's a narrative trying to form around the idea that they only started failing against Omicron.
You are assuming a static virus-host interaction. It's not a static system, it's dynamic. The virus is evolving to escape vaccine-induced immunity because that immunity is narrow and very similar across all vaccinated individuals. Newer variants are better at infecting and reinfecting vaccinated individuals. These individuals are poorly able to improve their immunity due to immune imprinting/OAS.