Now it's infecting children, I'm pretty sure I'm right about it being engineered not to infect women and that fact being covered up with gay sex allegations.
It was either a test to make sure the modifications to make it not affect women worked before something more lethal comes out, or it wasn't ready yet and got out early.
Hmmm.
Now it's infecting children, I'm pretty sure I'm right about it being engineered not to infect women and that fact being covered up with gay sex allegations.
You have issues.
Not the people who assume a gay guy raped a toddler? Really?
An STD that is exclusively in the gay community has spread to two kids.
Think for a second about that.
Yeah, I did. It doesn't make sense unless I'm right and the "gay community" line is a cover up.
If it was a woman you would have zero problems believing that explanation.
Actually I would, because I don't believe this strain of the disease is capable of infecting them.
Gays are vastly over represented in child sexual abuse statistics. They're the 13-50 of pedos.
Much more likely than someone back in 1970 engineering a virus.
But it wasn't 1970 and you know it.
Why would anyone go thru the trouble to create a virus that does not affect women if the virus is just an inconvenience. Is not AIDS
It was either a test to make sure the modifications to make it not affect women worked before something more lethal comes out, or it wasn't ready yet and got out early.
Dude, the first reported case was 1970.
Nineteen Seventy.
This thing ain't new.
I don't recall it being able to spread between people before. Fuck off shill.
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods
Comment Approved: again this isn't really what this rule is for.