"...if she hadn’t had access to safe and legal health care — fundamental health care.” Well, it certainly wasn't safe for the baby. And how can it possibly be considered health care in a procedure wherein two patients enter a room and only one patient exists, by design?
Because it was a producer or a director. If that's the case, and I think it is, it makes the whole story especially dark. "How can Hollywood function if those in power can't just have the underage girls terminate their pregnancies when they knock them up."
If we're taking her at her word, it's one of these (born 1970, so the films in '91 would only qualify if she got it early in production or fucked the Hollywood type for the role before production started):
1991 Dylan Thomas
Caitlin Thomas
1991 Robin Hood
Maid Marian
No, not the Kevin Costner one. The direct-to-TV one.
1990 Henry & June
June Miller / wife
Apparently the first film to be rated NC-17, for including a quick shot of Japanese tentacle porn.
1990 Where the Heart Is
Daphne McBain
1988 Dangerous Liaisons
Cécile de Volanges
1988 The Adventures of Baron Munchausen
Venus / Rose
Two fifths of Monty Python were involved here. Otherwise unremarkable.
1988 Johnny Be Good
Georgia Elkans
1987 Kiss Daddy Goodnight
Laura
The plot description reads like a wink and a nod here:
"Laura (Thurman) is a girl that loves to stroll around town at night wearing a different wig every night and hanging out with older and wealthy men. However she will have more than what she bargained for when one night she is chased by someone who wants to kill her..."
I didn't recognize any names, so we'll probably never find out who it was unless they decide to sue her for defamation.
Henry & June would be my bet then. Filmed when she was 18/19, released when she was 20, and the description is fairly depraved. I think the director also wrote the script. A betting man would choose him, or I guess keep his mouth shut, if the director is still alive and trawls semi-obscure forums for defamation suit bait.
Purely to suggest innuendo. "Significantly older man...while living overseas for acting" just screams tip-toe language. Author could've just skipped that altogether if they did not want to suggest an innuendo
How brave of her to take the popular position
*Corporate endorsed
I stand corrected.
Having money behind things tends to make them popular...
"...if she hadn’t had access to safe and legal health care — fundamental health care.” Well, it certainly wasn't safe for the baby. And how can it possibly be considered health care in a procedure wherein two patients enter a room and only one patient exists, by design?
TWO PATIENTS ENTER!
ONE PATIENT LEAVES!
Because it was a producer or a director. If that's the case, and I think it is, it makes the whole story especially dark. "How can Hollywood function if those in power can't just have the underage girls terminate their pregnancies when they knock them up."
If we're taking her at her word, it's one of these (born 1970, so the films in '91 would only qualify if she got it early in production or fucked the Hollywood type for the role before production started):
1991 Dylan Thomas
Caitlin Thomas
1991 Robin Hood
Maid Marian
No, not the Kevin Costner one. The direct-to-TV one.
1990 Henry & June
June Miller / wife
Apparently the first film to be rated NC-17, for including a quick shot of Japanese tentacle porn.
1990 Where the Heart Is
Daphne McBain
1988 Dangerous Liaisons
Cécile de Volanges
1988 The Adventures of Baron Munchausen
Venus / Rose
Two fifths of Monty Python were involved here. Otherwise unremarkable.
1988 Johnny Be Good
Georgia Elkans
1987 Kiss Daddy Goodnight
Laura
The plot description reads like a wink and a nod here: "Laura (Thurman) is a girl that loves to stroll around town at night wearing a different wig every night and hanging out with older and wealthy men. However she will have more than what she bargained for when one night she is chased by someone who wants to kill her..."
I didn't recognize any names, so we'll probably never find out who it was unless they decide to sue her for defamation.
She mentioned it was overseas which would narrow it down to Robin Hood, Henry & June, Dangerous Liaisons and The Adventures of Baron Munchausen.
Henry & June would be my bet then. Filmed when she was 18/19, released when she was 20, and the description is fairly depraved. I think the director also wrote the script. A betting man would choose him, or I guess keep his mouth shut, if the director is still alive and trawls semi-obscure forums for defamation suit bait.
Purely to suggest innuendo. "Significantly older man...while living overseas for acting" just screams tip-toe language. Author could've just skipped that altogether if they did not want to suggest an innuendo
Harvey Weinstein?
She got casting couched.
Yea they usually don’t admit that much.