And if you made your Women's March arguments intelligently, then that comeback would be impossible. The problem is that you consistently overplay your hand. Instead of saying: "this murdering black woman was a speaker, so every single person there supports murdering innocent men", say: "why were they attending a march that has as a speaker someone who tortured and murdered an innocent man?"
This made me laugh. You know Imp isn't capable of containing the rage to the point of making a rational statement about something involving women and degeneracy, even tangentially, though, right (sorry Imp. Sometimes you're ok...)..?
Like, if he was capable of that, he wouldn't be Imp. Unfortunately, ha.
It wasn't "Almost as good as Britney but not quite" Pride
That's a low bar to meet, and missing it shows how bad she must have been.
Anyway, my point is more - when these events happen, people usually go after the organizers.
Why didn't that happen this time? Who asked her to be there? The attendees have no influence on that.
This argument always gets used against me when I talk about how the Women's March was filled with all kinds of scum as speakers.
Slow tap... this is going after the organizers.
And if you made your Women's March arguments intelligently, then that comeback would be impossible. The problem is that you consistently overplay your hand. Instead of saying: "this murdering black woman was a speaker, so every single person there supports murdering innocent men", say: "why were they attending a march that has as a speaker someone who tortured and murdered an innocent man?"
This made me laugh. You know Imp isn't capable of containing the rage to the point of making a rational statement about something involving women and degeneracy, even tangentially, though, right (sorry Imp. Sometimes you're ok...)..?
Like, if he was capable of that, he wouldn't be Imp. Unfortunately, ha.