And if you made your Women's March arguments intelligently, then that comeback would be impossible. The problem is that you consistently overplay your hand. Instead of saying: "this murdering black woman was a speaker, so every single person there supports murdering innocent men", say: "why were they attending a march that has as a speaker someone who tortured and murdered an innocent man?"
This made me laugh. You know Imp isn't capable of containing the rage to the point of making a rational statement about something involving women and degeneracy, even tangentially, though, right (sorry Imp. Sometimes you're ok...)..?
Like, if he was capable of that, he wouldn't be Imp. Unfortunately, ha.
Slow tap... this is going after the organizers.
And if you made your Women's March arguments intelligently, then that comeback would be impossible. The problem is that you consistently overplay your hand. Instead of saying: "this murdering black woman was a speaker, so every single person there supports murdering innocent men", say: "why were they attending a march that has as a speaker someone who tortured and murdered an innocent man?"
This made me laugh. You know Imp isn't capable of containing the rage to the point of making a rational statement about something involving women and degeneracy, even tangentially, though, right (sorry Imp. Sometimes you're ok...)..?
Like, if he was capable of that, he wouldn't be Imp. Unfortunately, ha.