We hate it when blue haired feminists disrupt Ben Shapiro or Jordan Peterson talking. This isn't the way to get your point across. Pressure the organisers, pressure the location's owners, escalate the Governance boards and talk to your representatives.
Don't get in their face and disrupt the event, or you'll be rightfully arrested on some "public nuisance" by law.
We hate it when blue haired feminists disrupt Ben Shapiro or Jordan Peterson talking. This isn't the way to get your point across.
Maybe, maybe not, but I can certainly see the distinction. Although the left thinks talking can cause harm, they're morons. The right (correctly) thinks dragging kids to degeneracy can hurt the kids, and can certainly damage society. I can definitely see why groups feel they should go out and disrupt these disturbing events. Not necessarily saying it's the correct or optically correct thing to do, but I absolutely understand it.
This isn't a "both sides" or a "hypocrisy" thing, in my opinion, because there's a massive difference between speech and alphabet stuff involving children.
Maybe, maybe not, but I can certainly see the distinction.
The problem is the disrupter will now get to be labeled as such and the discussion will turn into "Look at this disturbance!" instead of the underlying issue. And drag story times will continue because people will be distracted discussing the "Disturbance".
It's like sending Death Threats to someone who says something stupid. All you're doing is preventing anyone else from criticizing the stupid.
The problem is the disrupter will now get to be labeled as such...
This is like saying in 2016 "I won't vote for Trump because he's vulgar," or whatever. Also, you can't be too concerned with optics when your opponent controls the discussion to begin with. They'll either say you're a Nazi, or ignore you. I recently heard an Ann Coulter quote, something along the lines of 'if they're not calling you racist, you're losing.' I think it's somewhat true. If your choices are to sit on your ass and play by their rules, or actually challenge them but called nasty names, the latter is far preferable.
...the discussion will turn into "Look at this disturbance!" instead of the underlying issue.
The underlying issue will be ignored completely unless a fuss is made, though. Again, you can't play by their rules, because they control almost everything.
And drag story times will continue because people will be distracted discussing the "Disturbance".
Drag story times will continue regardless, and it will only get worse, unless there is serious pushback. Not all of that pushback will be polite, and hit pieces will be written about any effective challenge to them, polite or otherwise. It doesn't matter if you do it the "right" way or the "wrong" way, they're going to smear you as a Nazi or similar regardless if you're effective, or they'll ignore you if you aren't effective.
Sorry, but 'what will the libs say?' is loser talk, and we should be well past it by this point. They get free reign on much of mainstream society and the narrative. Opponents of the left will never win trying to compete in their arena.
Then the next groomer will be picking up where the first one left off while you rot in a cell, and that next groomer will have tax payer funded security because of your antics.
You idiots cause more harm than you help with your stupid LARPs of being violent.
You have a point. They could and should have done a better job of this. But only for the story hour where the drag queen is in a costume and their nuts aren't on display.
The drag queen shows where kids are attending and giving dollar bills, go full on antifa with that shit. That's pedophilia and needs to be stopped before it starts where it can be.
We hate it when blue haired feminists disrupt Ben Shapiro or Jordan Peterson talking. This isn't the way to get your point across. Pressure the organisers, pressure the location's owners, escalate the Governance boards and talk to your representatives.
Don't get in their face and disrupt the event, or you'll be rightfully arrested on some "public nuisance" by law.
Maybe, maybe not, but I can certainly see the distinction. Although the left thinks talking can cause harm, they're morons. The right (correctly) thinks dragging kids to degeneracy can hurt the kids, and can certainly damage society. I can definitely see why groups feel they should go out and disrupt these disturbing events. Not necessarily saying it's the correct or optically correct thing to do, but I absolutely understand it.
This isn't a "both sides" or a "hypocrisy" thing, in my opinion, because there's a massive difference between speech and alphabet stuff involving children.
The problem is the disrupter will now get to be labeled as such and the discussion will turn into "Look at this disturbance!" instead of the underlying issue. And drag story times will continue because people will be distracted discussing the "Disturbance".
It's like sending Death Threats to someone who says something stupid. All you're doing is preventing anyone else from criticizing the stupid.
This is like saying in 2016 "I won't vote for Trump because he's vulgar," or whatever. Also, you can't be too concerned with optics when your opponent controls the discussion to begin with. They'll either say you're a Nazi, or ignore you. I recently heard an Ann Coulter quote, something along the lines of 'if they're not calling you racist, you're losing.' I think it's somewhat true. If your choices are to sit on your ass and play by their rules, or actually challenge them but called nasty names, the latter is far preferable.
The underlying issue will be ignored completely unless a fuss is made, though. Again, you can't play by their rules, because they control almost everything.
Drag story times will continue regardless, and it will only get worse, unless there is serious pushback. Not all of that pushback will be polite, and hit pieces will be written about any effective challenge to them, polite or otherwise. It doesn't matter if you do it the "right" way or the "wrong" way, they're going to smear you as a Nazi or similar regardless if you're effective, or they'll ignore you if you aren't effective.
Sorry, but 'what will the libs say?' is loser talk, and we should be well past it by this point. They get free reign on much of mainstream society and the narrative. Opponents of the left will never win trying to compete in their arena.
No, that's like saying "Don't be Patriot Front, a useful idiot who furthers the establishments narratives and serves no other useful purpose".
Engaging with Gouvernance boards, owners as been productive, getting into their faces only helps them.
It's getting shutdown elsewhere through lobbying, rather than direct confrontation.
Don't be a tool.
Or read my post again where I mention actual good solutions that don't involve becoming a useful idiot.
faggots infecting children with nonsense SHOULD be violently stopped.
Follow the law when it's only applied to you and not your enemies -retard
That's the thing, you won't win and you'll be in jail for your trouble. The kids will be groomed anyhow.
It's lose-lose. Going straight to venue owners works. Do that instead. Many of these have been cancelled through proper lobbying.
Not if the groomer is dead.
Then the next groomer will be picking up where the first one left off while you rot in a cell, and that next groomer will have tax payer funded security because of your antics.
You idiots cause more harm than you help with your stupid LARPs of being violent.
You have a point. They could and should have done a better job of this. But only for the story hour where the drag queen is in a costume and their nuts aren't on display.
The drag queen shows where kids are attending and giving dollar bills, go full on antifa with that shit. That's pedophilia and needs to be stopped before it starts where it can be.