More like rightly pointing out that troonery is a direct product of radical feminism.
The funniest thing is that he persuaded himself that "feminists are against troonerey", so he holds the opposite view - requiring him to ignore that nearly all feminists are 100% on board with it.
They are responsible for driving so many men into this insanity through their relentless denigration and demonisation of men and masculinity.
They are responsible for it because of the nonsense they preach, like gender theory. Not this. Because more and more women are trying to be pathetic shadows of men now.
Megan Murphy hates you because you are male.
Even if she does, I don't care. I only care if she is useful, and she is.
There's been far too much simping in nominally right-wing spaces to the Terfs, just because they've been on the receiving end of the pro-troon censorship regime. Suddenly, men in conservative spaces are bending over backwards to show how willing they are to defend women from the big bad trannies. When you do that, you're playing right into the hands of man-hating swamp scum like Megan Murphy, who will turn on you as soon as she gets what she wants from you, and use the right's own rhetoric about "protecting women's spaces" as a stick to beat yet another generation of young men into submission and alienation.
I said this yesterday in a different thread, and I'll repeat it here. However toxic and destructive some of the troons' behaviour is, the overwhelming majority of them are just a bunch of broken men. Our anger should be reserved for the forces that broke them.
There's been far too much simping in nominally right-wing spaces to the Terfs
I'm not saying this doesn't happen, but a distinction needs to be made between simping for the TERFs and wanting to do something about the troon problem for our own reasons. If the troons all disappeared tomorrow the TERFs would benefit, but so would everyone else. I want them dead because they're evil, they touch children, and their insistence on making everything about themselves means they can't leave anyone the fuck alone. Not because the feminists are suffering blowback from causing the problem. And since people use their grooming victims as an excuse to do nothing about the problem every time I say this, I'll add the caveat that this doesn't apply to their victims who haven't helped this cancer metastasize.
However toxic and destructive some of the troons' behaviour is, the overwhelming majority of them are just a bunch of broken men.
You could say the same thing about the (non tranny) pedophiles if you excluded the "just" in that sentence. It doesn't mean they aren't a problem that needs dealing with. That wouldn't change even if those pedophiles also had a habit of raping feminists.
She's not doing he activism for the good of you or me, obviously. But there still can be a symbiotic relationship, and there is.
When you do that, you're playing right into the hands of man-hating swamp scum like Megan Murphy, who will turn on you as soon as she gets what she wants from you, and use the right's own rhetoric about "protecting women's spaces" as a stick to beat yet another generation of young men into submission and alienation.
How exactly?
And even if she does, you need to be able to distinguish between major threats and minor threats. So what if she continues defending women's spaces? Who cares?
However toxic and destructive some of the troons' behaviour is, the overwhelming majority of them are just a bunch of broken men. Our anger should be reserved for the forces that broke them.
That's like saying that you shouldn't be angry at rabid dogs, but at the rabies virus.
you need to be able to distinguish between major threats and minor threats.
Again, I would argue that you're the one who is mistaking the smaller threat for the bigger one.
That's like saying that you shouldn't be angry at rabid dogs, but at the rabies virus.
Vaccinating your dogs against rabies prevents them from going rabid. That is how you solve the problem of rabid dogs. By preventing the virus from reproducing inside its host.
The feminist movement is responsible for the multi-generational destruction, denigration and demonization of men and masculinity: to the point where entire generations of young men have been raised to hate themselves simply for being male. The trans phenomenon is merely an offgrowth of that, if a particularly unpleasant one.
And yes, the trans movement has been latched onto by groomers and predators and pedophiles, who are always looking for new and inventive ways to normalize their behaviour.
But let's examine for a moment the psychology of grooming. Its central goal is to wear down the victim's emotional resistance to the abuse they suffer: to use their own desires against them, and to convince them to blame themselves for the abuse they suffer, to gaslight them into believing that they were somehow asking for this abuse, that they somehow made it happen, and that they somehow deserved it.
Well that precisely describes the techniques that the feminist movement has spent decades deploying against the entire male gender and especially against boys and young men, whose inexperience and emotional immaturity made them more susceptible to the grooming.
What we are (rightly) lambasting the troon ideology for doing to some children in schools and libraries or at pride parades, the feminist movement has already done to three entire generations of boys. Just because the abuse wasn't specific, doesn't mean that the emotional trauma and life-changing consequences of it aren't real.
But we let them get away with it, and we are continuing to let them get away with it by allowing them to carry on as if they are somehow the victims of the consequences of their own actions and rhetoric. They created this problem. You can not solve this problem by siding with them.
No, I know they did push it. That doesn't change that trannies taking their spaces doesn't benefit them. They're short-sighted, hateful, sadistic people. They saw the idea of castrating boys and got excited, they didn't plan further than that.
So they're simultaneously planning a brilliant Genocide Plan that terrifies you day and night, and which almost succeeded in killing 90% of the human population with the 'vaccine created by women to kill men', only foiled by your unwillingness to take it, but at the same time their attitude towards transgenderism is "OOGA BOOGA. ME LIKE CASTRATING LITTLE BOYS". And it ends up threatening female spaces and mutilating girls.
The funniest thing is that he persuaded himself that "feminists are against troonerey", so he holds the opposite view - requiring him to ignore that nearly all feminists are 100% on board with it.
They are responsible for it because of the nonsense they preach, like gender theory. Not this. Because more and more women are trying to be pathetic shadows of men now.
Even if she does, I don't care. I only care if she is useful, and she is.
I would argue that she is using you.
There's been far too much simping in nominally right-wing spaces to the Terfs, just because they've been on the receiving end of the pro-troon censorship regime. Suddenly, men in conservative spaces are bending over backwards to show how willing they are to defend women from the big bad trannies. When you do that, you're playing right into the hands of man-hating swamp scum like Megan Murphy, who will turn on you as soon as she gets what she wants from you, and use the right's own rhetoric about "protecting women's spaces" as a stick to beat yet another generation of young men into submission and alienation.
I said this yesterday in a different thread, and I'll repeat it here. However toxic and destructive some of the troons' behaviour is, the overwhelming majority of them are just a bunch of broken men. Our anger should be reserved for the forces that broke them.
I'm not saying this doesn't happen, but a distinction needs to be made between simping for the TERFs and wanting to do something about the troon problem for our own reasons. If the troons all disappeared tomorrow the TERFs would benefit, but so would everyone else. I want them dead because they're evil, they touch children, and their insistence on making everything about themselves means they can't leave anyone the fuck alone. Not because the feminists are suffering blowback from causing the problem. And since people use their grooming victims as an excuse to do nothing about the problem every time I say this, I'll add the caveat that this doesn't apply to their victims who haven't helped this cancer metastasize.
You could say the same thing about the (non tranny) pedophiles if you excluded the "just" in that sentence. It doesn't mean they aren't a problem that needs dealing with. That wouldn't change even if those pedophiles also had a habit of raping feminists.
She's not doing he activism for the good of you or me, obviously. But there still can be a symbiotic relationship, and there is.
How exactly?
And even if she does, you need to be able to distinguish between major threats and minor threats. So what if she continues defending women's spaces? Who cares?
That's like saying that you shouldn't be angry at rabid dogs, but at the rabies virus.
Again, I would argue that you're the one who is mistaking the smaller threat for the bigger one.
Vaccinating your dogs against rabies prevents them from going rabid. That is how you solve the problem of rabid dogs. By preventing the virus from reproducing inside its host.
The feminist movement is responsible for the multi-generational destruction, denigration and demonization of men and masculinity: to the point where entire generations of young men have been raised to hate themselves simply for being male. The trans phenomenon is merely an offgrowth of that, if a particularly unpleasant one.
And yes, the trans movement has been latched onto by groomers and predators and pedophiles, who are always looking for new and inventive ways to normalize their behaviour.
But let's examine for a moment the psychology of grooming. Its central goal is to wear down the victim's emotional resistance to the abuse they suffer: to use their own desires against them, and to convince them to blame themselves for the abuse they suffer, to gaslight them into believing that they were somehow asking for this abuse, that they somehow made it happen, and that they somehow deserved it.
Well that precisely describes the techniques that the feminist movement has spent decades deploying against the entire male gender and especially against boys and young men, whose inexperience and emotional immaturity made them more susceptible to the grooming.
What we are (rightly) lambasting the troon ideology for doing to some children in schools and libraries or at pride parades, the feminist movement has already done to three entire generations of boys. Just because the abuse wasn't specific, doesn't mean that the emotional trauma and life-changing consequences of it aren't real.
But we let them get away with it, and we are continuing to let them get away with it by allowing them to carry on as if they are somehow the victims of the consequences of their own actions and rhetoric. They created this problem. You can not solve this problem by siding with them.
Thank you for saying this. It'll probably get less derision with someone else saying it.
TERFs are all buddy-buddy with the Coercive Control people in the UK, something that proves their true intent.
No, I know they did push it. That doesn't change that trannies taking their spaces doesn't benefit them. They're short-sighted, hateful, sadistic people. They saw the idea of castrating boys and got excited, they didn't plan further than that.
So they're simultaneously planning a brilliant Genocide Plan that terrifies you day and night, and which almost succeeded in killing 90% of the human population with the 'vaccine created by women to kill men', only foiled by your unwillingness to take it, but at the same time their attitude towards transgenderism is "OOGA BOOGA. ME LIKE CASTRATING LITTLE BOYS". And it ends up threatening female spaces and mutilating girls.
Makes perfect snese.
Without sounding like a stormcuck, Hitler was regarded as a great thinker. It didn't stop him going full retard and invading the USSR in winter.
If you really want something to happen, you will ignore the logic that says you shouldn't do it.
If someone came to power and threw every feminist into prison, I would probably be unable to see any red flags they showed.
He invaded on the first day of summer.
Or maybe, maybe, your crazy ideas are just that: crazy.
Your lack of critical thinking does not really inspire confidence in what you espouse now.