Aside: you're getting mad at criticism of troonery yet again.
More like rightly pointing out that troonery is a direct product of radical feminism. They are responsible for driving so many men into this insanity through their relentless denigration and demonisation of men and masculinity. Siding with them when they turn around complain about the troons invading their spaces effectively just amounts to right-wing simping.
Megan Murphy hates you because you are male. She and her ilk are primarily responsible, not only for the crisis of masculinity that has generated the transgender phenomenon in the first place, but also for the regime of state-sponsored censorship and criminalisation of speech that is now being used against them. They do not deserve our sympathy.
More like rightly pointing out that troonery is a direct product of radical feminism.
The funniest thing is that he persuaded himself that "feminists are against troonerey", so he holds the opposite view - requiring him to ignore that nearly all feminists are 100% on board with it.
They are responsible for driving so many men into this insanity through their relentless denigration and demonisation of men and masculinity.
They are responsible for it because of the nonsense they preach, like gender theory. Not this. Because more and more women are trying to be pathetic shadows of men now.
Megan Murphy hates you because you are male.
Even if she does, I don't care. I only care if she is useful, and she is.
There's been far too much simping in nominally right-wing spaces to the Terfs, just because they've been on the receiving end of the pro-troon censorship regime. Suddenly, men in conservative spaces are bending over backwards to show how willing they are to defend women from the big bad trannies. When you do that, you're playing right into the hands of man-hating swamp scum like Megan Murphy, who will turn on you as soon as she gets what she wants from you, and use the right's own rhetoric about "protecting women's spaces" as a stick to beat yet another generation of young men into submission and alienation.
I said this yesterday in a different thread, and I'll repeat it here. However toxic and destructive some of the troons' behaviour is, the overwhelming majority of them are just a bunch of broken men. Our anger should be reserved for the forces that broke them.
There's been far too much simping in nominally right-wing spaces to the Terfs
I'm not saying this doesn't happen, but a distinction needs to be made between simping for the TERFs and wanting to do something about the troon problem for our own reasons. If the troons all disappeared tomorrow the TERFs would benefit, but so would everyone else. I want them dead because they're evil, they touch children, and their insistence on making everything about themselves means they can't leave anyone the fuck alone. Not because the feminists are suffering blowback from causing the problem. And since people use their grooming victims as an excuse to do nothing about the problem every time I say this, I'll add the caveat that this doesn't apply to their victims who haven't helped this cancer metastasize.
However toxic and destructive some of the troons' behaviour is, the overwhelming majority of them are just a bunch of broken men.
You could say the same thing about the (non tranny) pedophiles if you excluded the "just" in that sentence. It doesn't mean they aren't a problem that needs dealing with. That wouldn't change even if those pedophiles also had a habit of raping feminists.
She's not doing he activism for the good of you or me, obviously. But there still can be a symbiotic relationship, and there is.
When you do that, you're playing right into the hands of man-hating swamp scum like Megan Murphy, who will turn on you as soon as she gets what she wants from you, and use the right's own rhetoric about "protecting women's spaces" as a stick to beat yet another generation of young men into submission and alienation.
How exactly?
And even if she does, you need to be able to distinguish between major threats and minor threats. So what if she continues defending women's spaces? Who cares?
However toxic and destructive some of the troons' behaviour is, the overwhelming majority of them are just a bunch of broken men. Our anger should be reserved for the forces that broke them.
That's like saying that you shouldn't be angry at rabid dogs, but at the rabies virus.
No, I know they did push it. That doesn't change that trannies taking their spaces doesn't benefit them. They're short-sighted, hateful, sadistic people. They saw the idea of castrating boys and got excited, they didn't plan further than that.
So they're simultaneously planning a brilliant Genocide Plan that terrifies you day and night, and which almost succeeded in killing 90% of the human population with the 'vaccine created by women to kill men', only foiled by your unwillingness to take it, but at the same time their attitude towards transgenderism is "OOGA BOOGA. ME LIKE CASTRATING LITTLE BOYS". And it ends up threatening female spaces and mutilating girls.
More like rightly pointing out that troonery is a direct product of radical feminism. They are responsible for driving so many men into this insanity
Imagine still lumping all feminists into a big pile after 2014 and Gamergate happened.
You do understand the TERFs, no matter how much they hate men, hate Intersectional Feminists just as much right ? You realise Troonery is supported by Intersectionals. And thus, this is Feminist on Feminist fighting.
Why are you siding with the Troons is the bigger question ? I bet you like Troon story time for kids too.
Regardless of any ideological differences, feminists are united by their hatred of men, and simping for them is not going to make them hate you any less.
Troonery is a product of feminism, and they will never acknowledge their role in creating this problem because, being feminists, their goal is to ensure that women never have to accept responsibility for anything. You will never be able to solve this problem by siding with the terfs against the troons. Troonery is a symptom. Feminism is the disease.
Speaking about feminists and transgenderism, I'm working on a theory that connects them to it and proves that it's something that came out of women's hatred definitively.
Right, so this takes a lot of background, so I don't know if it'll all connect as it stands.
Anke Ehrhardt had a lot of influence on government, LGBT and left-wing institutions compared to Money himself. She even managed to get a job working for Fauci during the AIDS epidemic. Her influence extended to the Ford Foundation, who made her a board member.
American author, conservative philosopher, and critic of feminism Christina Hoff Sommers, criticized The Ford Foundation in her book The War Against Boys (2000) as well as other institutions in education and government.[69] Sommers alleged that the Ford Foundation funded feminist ideologies that marginalize boys and men.
Moving back to my original premise, and what connects it all together. Sally Miller Gearhart, who created the essay I quote ad infinitum, was the first ever creator of a gender studies curriculum.
There, she was able to develop one of the first women and gender studies programs in the United States.
I'm sure I don't need to explain that gender studies is based on Ehrhardt's work, and that the study was published in 1972, with less than 12 months between it and Gearhart's "revolutionary" gender studies curriculum.
Unless someone has a copy of the curriculum themselves that disproves it, my theory that Gearhart was actively involved in normalizing transgenderism holds up.
TL;DR : Male genocide advocates created transgenderism, and now they're getting scared of their victims overthrowing them.
Speaking about feminists and transgenderism, I'm working on a theory that connects them to it and proves that it's something that came out of women's hatred definitively.
I guess if there's a theory, then that proves it definitively.
Speaking of the Ford Foundation...
Are you citing Christina Hoff Sommers, someone notorious for being a woman and who therefore wants me dead and tortured? Maybe she is just trying to destroy the Ford Foundation's good work. I DO NOT TRUST THEEEEM!
Sally Miller Gearhart, who created the essay I quote ad infinitum, was the first ever creator of a gender studies curriculum.
That's got to be the weakest argument against Gender Studies in existence.
Unless someone has a copy of the curriculum themselves that disproves it, my theory that Gearhart was actively involved in normalizing transgenderism holds up.
This does not follow.
Male genocide advocates created transgenderism, and now they're getting scared of their victims overthrowing them.
Yes, this is the best part - where you don't realize that 95% of your dreaded feminists support this nonsense. I guess it's copium or something.
Well, if it all connects and has no obvious flaws, it does prove it. A lot of things we accept as facts are just theories.
yawn I just wanted to have a source that showed the Ford Foundation to be anti-male.
Well, how so? She was a lunatic who wanted to kill 90% of men in existence. Her endorsement of anything is toxic.
Gender studies is based on transgender theory - this is a fact.
The trannies are the monster that turned on the creator. Unless you have an answer for why women would want to be pushed out of their own spaces. I suppose they could be counting on spineless RINOs to save them, even though women don't vote Republican. Probably a logical outcome, nothing gets establishment Republicans excited like pumping up fake issues to support women.
She wouldn't call herself a right-winger either.
But doesn't mean she cannot be useful.
Aside: you're getting mad at criticism of troonery yet again.
More like rightly pointing out that troonery is a direct product of radical feminism. They are responsible for driving so many men into this insanity through their relentless denigration and demonisation of men and masculinity. Siding with them when they turn around complain about the troons invading their spaces effectively just amounts to right-wing simping.
Megan Murphy hates you because you are male. She and her ilk are primarily responsible, not only for the crisis of masculinity that has generated the transgender phenomenon in the first place, but also for the regime of state-sponsored censorship and criminalisation of speech that is now being used against them. They do not deserve our sympathy.
The funniest thing is that he persuaded himself that "feminists are against troonerey", so he holds the opposite view - requiring him to ignore that nearly all feminists are 100% on board with it.
They are responsible for it because of the nonsense they preach, like gender theory. Not this. Because more and more women are trying to be pathetic shadows of men now.
Even if she does, I don't care. I only care if she is useful, and she is.
I would argue that she is using you.
There's been far too much simping in nominally right-wing spaces to the Terfs, just because they've been on the receiving end of the pro-troon censorship regime. Suddenly, men in conservative spaces are bending over backwards to show how willing they are to defend women from the big bad trannies. When you do that, you're playing right into the hands of man-hating swamp scum like Megan Murphy, who will turn on you as soon as she gets what she wants from you, and use the right's own rhetoric about "protecting women's spaces" as a stick to beat yet another generation of young men into submission and alienation.
I said this yesterday in a different thread, and I'll repeat it here. However toxic and destructive some of the troons' behaviour is, the overwhelming majority of them are just a bunch of broken men. Our anger should be reserved for the forces that broke them.
I'm not saying this doesn't happen, but a distinction needs to be made between simping for the TERFs and wanting to do something about the troon problem for our own reasons. If the troons all disappeared tomorrow the TERFs would benefit, but so would everyone else. I want them dead because they're evil, they touch children, and their insistence on making everything about themselves means they can't leave anyone the fuck alone. Not because the feminists are suffering blowback from causing the problem. And since people use their grooming victims as an excuse to do nothing about the problem every time I say this, I'll add the caveat that this doesn't apply to their victims who haven't helped this cancer metastasize.
You could say the same thing about the (non tranny) pedophiles if you excluded the "just" in that sentence. It doesn't mean they aren't a problem that needs dealing with. That wouldn't change even if those pedophiles also had a habit of raping feminists.
She's not doing he activism for the good of you or me, obviously. But there still can be a symbiotic relationship, and there is.
How exactly?
And even if she does, you need to be able to distinguish between major threats and minor threats. So what if she continues defending women's spaces? Who cares?
That's like saying that you shouldn't be angry at rabid dogs, but at the rabies virus.
Thank you for saying this. It'll probably get less derision with someone else saying it.
TERFs are all buddy-buddy with the Coercive Control people in the UK, something that proves their true intent.
No, I know they did push it. That doesn't change that trannies taking their spaces doesn't benefit them. They're short-sighted, hateful, sadistic people. They saw the idea of castrating boys and got excited, they didn't plan further than that.
So they're simultaneously planning a brilliant Genocide Plan that terrifies you day and night, and which almost succeeded in killing 90% of the human population with the 'vaccine created by women to kill men', only foiled by your unwillingness to take it, but at the same time their attitude towards transgenderism is "OOGA BOOGA. ME LIKE CASTRATING LITTLE BOYS". And it ends up threatening female spaces and mutilating girls.
Makes perfect snese.
Imagine still lumping all feminists into a big pile after 2014 and Gamergate happened.
You do understand the TERFs, no matter how much they hate men, hate Intersectional Feminists just as much right ? You realise Troonery is supported by Intersectionals. And thus, this is Feminist on Feminist fighting.
Why are you siding with the Troons is the bigger question ? I bet you like Troon story time for kids too.
Regardless of any ideological differences, feminists are united by their hatred of men, and simping for them is not going to make them hate you any less.
Troonery is a product of feminism, and they will never acknowledge their role in creating this problem because, being feminists, their goal is to ensure that women never have to accept responsibility for anything. You will never be able to solve this problem by siding with the terfs against the troons. Troonery is a symptom. Feminism is the disease.
This is how I know you are either trolling or haven't been paying attention at all.
Speaking about feminists and transgenderism, I'm working on a theory that connects them to it and proves that it's something that came out of women's hatred definitively.
Right, so this takes a lot of background, so I don't know if it'll all connect as it stands.
Anke Ehrhardt had a lot of influence on government, LGBT and left-wing institutions compared to Money himself. She even managed to get a job working for Fauci during the AIDS epidemic. Her influence extended to the Ford Foundation, who made her a board member.
https://archive.ph/Ap9Zr
Speaking of the Ford Foundation...
Moving back to my original premise, and what connects it all together. Sally Miller Gearhart, who created the essay I quote ad infinitum, was the first ever creator of a gender studies curriculum.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart
I'm sure I don't need to explain that gender studies is based on Ehrhardt's work, and that the study was published in 1972, with less than 12 months between it and Gearhart's "revolutionary" gender studies curriculum.
[Gearhart is listed as a transgender advocate here.(https://archive.ph/Jegk5)
Unless someone has a copy of the curriculum themselves that disproves it, my theory that Gearhart was actively involved in normalizing transgenderism holds up.
TL;DR : Male genocide advocates created transgenderism, and now they're getting scared of their victims overthrowing them.
Let's see what flaws you can find in it.
I guess if there's a theory, then that proves it definitively.
Are you citing Christina Hoff Sommers, someone notorious for being a woman and who therefore wants me dead and tortured? Maybe she is just trying to destroy the Ford Foundation's good work. I DO NOT TRUST THEEEEM!
That's got to be the weakest argument against Gender Studies in existence.
This does not follow.
Yes, this is the best part - where you don't realize that 95% of your dreaded feminists support this nonsense. I guess it's copium or something.
Well, if it all connects and has no obvious flaws, it does prove it. A lot of things we accept as facts are just theories.
yawn I just wanted to have a source that showed the Ford Foundation to be anti-male.
Well, how so? She was a lunatic who wanted to kill 90% of men in existence. Her endorsement of anything is toxic.
Gender studies is based on transgender theory - this is a fact.
The trannies are the monster that turned on the creator. Unless you have an answer for why women would want to be pushed out of their own spaces. I suppose they could be counting on spineless RINOs to save them, even though women don't vote Republican. Probably a logical outcome, nothing gets establishment Republicans excited like pumping up fake issues to support women.
I think your understanding of 'proof' is a tiny bit flawed.
So you literally cite a genocidal, pro-torture, murderous WOMAN? I'd rather that you cite a source that doesn't want me DEAD.
Same reason we don't torture dogs because Hitler loved animals.
Right, except that 95% of your feminists are still 100% on board with this monster.
Same reason they want underage girls to be raped in Rotherham.