How unfathomably stupid are you, if you don't even know that Obama (the woman) took office on 20 January 2009?
This is Kim Potter all over again.
Lithuania is responsible for this war.
Because Lithuania was 'the first' to advocate for Ukraine joining NATO.
Baracka Obama was 'the first' to advocate for it in 2008.
No, it was actually Georgina Bush.
?????
FUCK WOMEN
For that matter, if you are not even aware of such basic facts, why are you even commenting on this war? I know, I know, to attack women for this "women's war" - which I honestly think is the best part of this stand-up act of yours.
Ukraine does not qualify for NATO entry due to an active civil war over the status of the DPR and LPR.
Lithuania planned to force them in via EU backing, which is playing out right now. Von Der Leyen plans to force their entry via a simple majority vote.
Also, I suppose the two feminist terrorist states deciding they want to align against Russia and risk nuclear war even though nobody cared about them is a coincidence.
Why did you move your argument from "Lithuania was the first to advocate for Ukraine joining NATO" to "UKRAINE SHOULD NOT JOIN NATO", which was not at issue?
Could it be that you, at long last, felt a tinge of embarrassment over the nonsense you spew? Why are you commenting on everything at all if you think Obama was president in 2008?
Von Der Leyen plans to force their entry via a simple majority vote.
Noted as your next prediction. Von der Leyen, previously noted for using the ECB to force vaccination mandates on member states, will now get Ukraine into NATO - despite having no position at all in NATO.
2008 would be Barack "Women are indisputably better than men" Obama's presidency.
How unfathomably stupid are you, if you don't even know that Obama (the woman) took office on 20 January 2009?
This is Kim Potter all over again.
For that matter, if you are not even aware of such basic facts, why are you even commenting on this war? I know, I know, to attack women for this "women's war" - which I honestly think is the best part of this stand-up act of yours.
Yawn.
Ukraine does not qualify for NATO entry due to an active civil war over the status of the DPR and LPR.
Lithuania planned to force them in via EU backing, which is playing out right now. Von Der Leyen plans to force their entry via a simple majority vote.
Also, I suppose the two feminist terrorist states deciding they want to align against Russia and risk nuclear war even though nobody cared about them is a coincidence.
Why did you move your argument from "Lithuania was the first to advocate for Ukraine joining NATO" to "UKRAINE SHOULD NOT JOIN NATO", which was not at issue?
Could it be that you, at long last, felt a tinge of embarrassment over the nonsense you spew? Why are you commenting on everything at all if you think Obama was president in 2008?
I haven't changed my argument. 12 years is a long time. Georgia did join NATO if I remember correctly.
These corrections are getting tiring. It's such a feminine way to argue. You haven't even provided a source for your claim, by the way.
Noted as your next prediction. Von der Leyen, previously noted for using the ECB to force vaccination mandates on member states, will now get Ukraine into NATO - despite having no position at all in NATO.
Into the EU, which will then push EU countries to defend them if attacked.
Don't try and misrepresent when you know that it doesn't make sense read that way.