Why do you need a union to organize a strike? If your bosses are unfair to you, you can all agree to stop working without any need to be paying union fees to some commie union boss.
I'm fine with unions being just that. If a large group of employees wants to organize for collective bargaining, go ahead. You get no special legal recognition, and you cannot compel other employees to join you if they don't want to.
But that is in fact the point, to force everyone to join.
I'm not pro or anti union, but I will say that unlike women, trying to get men together to collectively do something, even it's something that benefits them, is kind of hard. Every man would have to be on the same page for it to work, and most men are in a "do my own thing" mode as a default.
I don't understand the point of unions.
Why do you need a union to organize a strike? If your bosses are unfair to you, you can all agree to stop working without any need to be paying union fees to some commie union boss.
I'm fine with unions being just that. If a large group of employees wants to organize for collective bargaining, go ahead. You get no special legal recognition, and you cannot compel other employees to join you if they don't want to.
But that is in fact the point, to force everyone to join.
Yuri was right again.
I'm not pro or anti union, but I will say that unlike women, trying to get men together to collectively do something, even it's something that benefits them, is kind of hard. Every man would have to be on the same page for it to work, and most men are in a "do my own thing" mode as a default.
Well this is a good example the benefits of unions. Company sees the benefit of paying non-union members more to not join the union.