All the mass shooters out there should now identify as transwomen and say : "I'm a woman and always have been, I was a woman when I shot those 80 people....how can it be because of masculinity transphobe?"
So a guy who had a history of working with the RCMP, and of not being charged for several incidents of domestic violence, and who owned several replica cop cars, went on a two day rampage that the RCMP were seemingly powerless to stop. They refused the assistance of a (news?) helicopter and, at one point, two officers fired shots at a fire station and then drove away without checking for casualties.
Police sources say the killer's withdrawal of $475,000 was highly irregular, and how an RCMP ‘agent’ would get money
"A Mountie familiar with the techniques used by the force in undercover operations, but not with the details of the investigation into the shooting, says Wortman could not have collected his own money from Brink’s as a private citizen.
“There’s no way a civilian can just make an arrangement like that,” he said in an interview.
He added that Wortman’s transaction is consistent with the Mountie’s experience in how the RCMP pays its assets. “I’ve worked a number of CI cases over the years and that’s how things go. All the payments are made in cash. To me that transaction alone proves he has a secret relationship with the force.”
A second Mountie, who does not know the first one but who has also been involved in CI operations, also believes that Wortman’s ability to withdraw a large sum of money from Brink’s is an indication that Wortman had a link with the police. “That’s tradecraft,” the Mountie said, explaining that by going through CIBC Intria, the RCMP could avoid typical banking scrutiny, as there are no holds placed on the money.
“That’s what we do when we need flash money for a buy. We don’t keep stashes of money around the office. When we suddenly need a large sum of money to make a buy or something, that’s the route we take. I think [with the Brink’s transaction] you’ve proved with that single fact that he had a relationship with the police. He was either a CI or an agent.”
I wonder if we can be certain it wasn't caused by androgyny? Or femininity. Do we have double-blind studies? Isn't "Masculinity" a gender binary and therefore a hate crime to imply it exists?
Society offloads handling difficult and unpleasant things to men.
It is true that most violence is done by men, women simply learn that when they want violence it's better to get a man to do it for them. This is true today just as it was before - when they demand rapists be arrested they send make cops. When they demand an abusive boyfriend be arrested they send male cops. When they fire a man for "sexual harrassment" and they need security, they bring in men.
So what happens if feminists got rid of all the men, woman had to do male jobs commit violence themselves if they wanted it done?
It's pretty women would simply take the male roles and start becoming violent in mens place.
An off-duty NYPD cop, enraged at finding her ex-girlfriend together with another woman, shot them both Wednesday — killing the new lover and wounding the estranged gal pal, police sources said.
...
The jealous officer’s ex-girlfriend, 23, was expected to survive a gunshot wound to her torso; the new lover, identified as Jamie Liang, 24, was blasted numerous times and died, sources said.
...
When one of the victims called 911, the operator could hear someone in the background saying, “That’s what you get,” sources tell the Daily News.
Feminist women pushing people to breaking point and then using the results to push their genocide agenda still doesn't make the top 10 evil things they do somehow.
Also, the Canada shooting was almost certainly a fed.
All the mass shooters out there should now identify as transwomen and say : "I'm a woman and always have been, I was a woman when I shot those 80 people....how can it be because of masculinity transphobe?"
Aren't a lot of these shooters being "raised" by single moms? Sounds like lack of masculinity is a bigger 'cause.'
So a guy who had a history of working with the RCMP, and of not being charged for several incidents of domestic violence, and who owned several replica cop cars, went on a two day rampage that the RCMP were seemingly powerless to stop. They refused the assistance of a (news?) helicopter and, at one point, two officers fired shots at a fire station and then drove away without checking for casualties.
RCMP: It's guns...and men...
Police sources say the killer's withdrawal of $475,000 was highly irregular, and how an RCMP ‘agent’ would get money
"A Mountie familiar with the techniques used by the force in undercover operations, but not with the details of the investigation into the shooting, says Wortman could not have collected his own money from Brink’s as a private citizen.
“There’s no way a civilian can just make an arrangement like that,” he said in an interview.
He added that Wortman’s transaction is consistent with the Mountie’s experience in how the RCMP pays its assets. “I’ve worked a number of CI cases over the years and that’s how things go. All the payments are made in cash. To me that transaction alone proves he has a secret relationship with the force.”
A second Mountie, who does not know the first one but who has also been involved in CI operations, also believes that Wortman’s ability to withdraw a large sum of money from Brink’s is an indication that Wortman had a link with the police. “That’s tradecraft,” the Mountie said, explaining that by going through CIBC Intria, the RCMP could avoid typical banking scrutiny, as there are no holds placed on the money.
“That’s what we do when we need flash money for a buy. We don’t keep stashes of money around the office. When we suddenly need a large sum of money to make a buy or something, that’s the route we take. I think [with the Brink’s transaction] you’ve proved with that single fact that he had a relationship with the police. He was either a CI or an agent.”
https://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/the-nova-scotia-shooter-case-has-hallmarks-of-an-undercover-operation/amp/
I wonder if we can be certain it wasn't caused by androgyny? Or femininity. Do we have double-blind studies? Isn't "Masculinity" a gender binary and therefore a hate crime to imply it exists?
How do they know? Are any of the people in that study biologists?
Society offloads handling difficult and unpleasant things to men.
It is true that most violence is done by men, women simply learn that when they want violence it's better to get a man to do it for them. This is true today just as it was before - when they demand rapists be arrested they send make cops. When they demand an abusive boyfriend be arrested they send male cops. When they fire a man for "sexual harrassment" and they need security, they bring in men.
So what happens if feminists got rid of all the men, woman had to do male jobs commit violence themselves if they wanted it done?
It's pretty women would simply take the male roles and start becoming violent in mens place.
https://archive.ph/TrEfP
I mean, they're almost correct. You need some amount of testosterone in your body to pull the trigger.
But, we could do so much more with channeled masculinity into good activities to build men up.
I'm afraid that is not the cause. Search deeper, suckers.
Feminist women pushing people to breaking point and then using the results to push their genocide agenda still doesn't make the top 10 evil things they do somehow.
Also, the Canada shooting was almost certainly a fed.