There are about four men on the planet who have a viable opinion on the matter. Everybody else doesn't know how the other half lives.
My unit works fine, but I don't know how anybody else's works. The only people who actually know the effects of cutting the turtleneck down are men who had it done in their late twenties or early thirties - anyone else could be conflating the effects of aging or simply imagining the grass on the other side of the fence.
Regardless, it's a one-way decision, so nobody should be making it on behalf of someone else.
Some people take issue with the idea that their parents decided to inflict a cosmetic surgical removal of healthy tissue from their genitals shortly after their birth.
Crazy, I know, that people might object to irreversible surgeries performed on them without their understanding or consent.
I can even empathize with the ones who chose to do it in adulthood, since the pro-circumcision lobby is strong on the cultural front, and no one wants to say "well, if you chop off a chunk of nerve-rich tissue, your penis will become inherently much less sensitive. What did you think, you evolved that thing by accident?"
What did you think, you evolved that thing by accident?"
Your gall bladder says hello.
I'm not disagreeing with your eventual point - that irreversible decisions shouldn't be made without informed consent - but you're not making your strongest argument.
The trans trend is worldwide, at least in the Western Globohomo sphere. Circumcision is primarily done in North America, Australia, Africa, and the Middle-East.
This is a bit old, being from 2013, but circumcision rates have been slowly decreasing. There's really not any correlation in the first place. And the US has had a fairly high circumcision rate since the early 20th century when all of the "medical" reasons for it were popularized.
If you have some more recent data that shows a spike shortly after that date that could correspond with the time delayed spike in mentally ill trannies we're seeing now, then you could be on to something.
This is further reaffirming my suspicions that having your dick cut to lessen sexual pleasure is forcing some men to find "alternate" forms of pleasure
Seems doubtful.
More likely that men who dedicate lots of thought to their penis are more likely to get annoyed that part of it is missing.
Maybe other people with circumcised dicks had a 'worse' operation performed on them than I did, but I have never once thought 'I really wish sex and masturbation felt better' in my entire life as a circumcised individual. Feels pretty great as is, and I do not think my life would be improved if it felt better.
There are already "support groups" for trannies talking about regretting what their well meaning but subversively indoctrinated parents did to them.
Why wouldn't there be for circumcision.
There are about four men on the planet who have a viable opinion on the matter. Everybody else doesn't know how the other half lives.
My unit works fine, but I don't know how anybody else's works. The only people who actually know the effects of cutting the turtleneck down are men who had it done in their late twenties or early thirties - anyone else could be conflating the effects of aging or simply imagining the grass on the other side of the fence.
Regardless, it's a one-way decision, so nobody should be making it on behalf of someone else.
Some people take issue with the idea that their parents decided to inflict a cosmetic surgical removal of healthy tissue from their genitals shortly after their birth.
Crazy, I know, that people might object to irreversible surgeries performed on them without their understanding or consent.
I can even empathize with the ones who chose to do it in adulthood, since the pro-circumcision lobby is strong on the cultural front, and no one wants to say "well, if you chop off a chunk of nerve-rich tissue, your penis will become inherently much less sensitive. What did you think, you evolved that thing by accident?"
Your gall bladder says hello.
I'm not disagreeing with your eventual point - that irreversible decisions shouldn't be made without informed consent - but you're not making your strongest argument.
The trans trend is worldwide, at least in the Western Globohomo sphere. Circumcision is primarily done in North America, Australia, Africa, and the Middle-East.
Pretty much 100% of Jewish and Muslim men, worldwide, are circumcised.
For Christians, it's mostly the US (and some few other areas) for "health" or "don't masturbate" reasons.
Beyond that, some African groups, Filipinos, handful of smaller religions, etc. Very rare in China and non-Muslims in India. etc
>muh health reasons
Apparently, concepts like "soap", "condoms", and "not fucking random vagabonds" are completely foreign to people.
But the trans trend is disproportionately pushed by Jews. Checkmate.
This is a bit old, being from 2013, but circumcision rates have been slowly decreasing. There's really not any correlation in the first place. And the US has had a fairly high circumcision rate since the early 20th century when all of the "medical" reasons for it were popularized.
If you have some more recent data that shows a spike shortly after that date that could correspond with the time delayed spike in mentally ill trannies we're seeing now, then you could be on to something.
Seems doubtful.
More likely that men who dedicate lots of thought to their penis are more likely to get annoyed that part of it is missing.
More likely that men who dedicate lots of thought to their penis and are unhappy with it get annoyed that part of it is missing.
You don't see any strident pro-circumcision cutfags, because most of them are too busy not hating themselves.
Maybe other people with circumcised dicks had a 'worse' operation performed on them than I did, but I have never once thought 'I really wish sex and masturbation felt better' in my entire life as a circumcised individual. Feels pretty great as is, and I do not think my life would be improved if it felt better.
... and you didn't consider the fact that they're women, and you're ostensibly not as a possible explanation?
I'm not seeing how you personally having a limp dick has any bearing on what was done to you or anyone else is harmful.
You literally can't even.