Pfizer’s only large scale trial showed minimal difference in infection, hospitalization, and death rates. Then Pfizer deliberately blew up the control group after two months.
Put another way: any efficacy of the vaccines is almost certainly a mirage created by data manipulation.
During the blinded, placebo-controlled period, 15 participants in the BNT162b2 group and 14 in the placebo group died; during the openlabel period, 3 participants in the BNT162b2 group and 2 in the original placebo group who received BNT162b2 after unblinding died. None of these deaths were considered to be related to BNT162b2 by the investigators.
Twenty people died in the vaccine group and fourteen died in the control group, but Pfizer said the extra deaths were no big deal so no problem. In table S4 of the supplement, you can see where those extra deaths came from. Nine of the deaths in the vaccine group and five in the placebo were due to cardiovascular failure, or almost double the rate. In these studies all excess deaths in the experiment group are supposed to be attributed to the drug, otherwise what is even the point.
Pfizer knew. The FDA knew. Everyone lied and people died.
Way back in the early days of the pandemic, I remember doctors still openly talking about their observations of Covid patients. They said there were two stages. The first, where it was basically just a bad cold, maybe a moderate flu, in terms of symptoms. Then, in the second stage, the immune system would suddenly go into overdrive, and it was that immune overreaction that was putting people in the ICU.
If any of that was actually true, then I could see how the "vaccine" could actually make it worse. For people who were already going to have an immune response that severe, all it was really doing was prepping the body to go as hard as possible, as fast as possible.
At least, it makes sense to me, as far as one can make any sense out of the available info.
Then, in the second stage, the immune system would suddenly go into overdrive, and it was that immune overreaction that was putting people in the ICU.
AKA, a Cytokine Storm. And yes, it is one of the major risk factors in WuFlu infections. And we've known for literal decades that coronavirus vaccines don't work because they can trigger cytokine storms when you get actually infected.
from 2007 - Vaccinated ferrets get liver damage exposed to the disease.
from 2011 - Vaccinated mice get their lungs wrecked after virus exposure
from 2016 - Vaccinated rhesus monkeys also have their lungs wrecked after virus exposure
There has never been a successful vaccine against a coronavirus - those we have come up with have always had a risk of severe side effects when you actually encounter the virus. That has been known since SARS first popped up in 2003, if not earlier. And now we get to see the same reactions over the next few years people as we saw for decades in animals.
I think an oversimplistic explanation is probably that wrt the prevention of severe symptoms, it's still better to have some pre-existing antibody memory queued up even if incomplete and shitty rather than being completely immunologically-naive in the face of a new/first time COVID exposure.
So the shitty and incomplete antibodies produced by the COVID vaccines aren't good enough to prevent viral seeding and replication in the throat and nose following new COVID exposure, but likely can eventually hamper viral replication enough at other sites of the body that it buys time for other slower defenses to engage and prevent more serious consequences than your usual runny nose and sore throat.
Early antibody production addressing the initial infection earlier may also prevent other immune systems from freaking out and overreacting, creating cytokine storms and bad outcomes from self-destruction.
Scientists say we need to reset our expectations for the vaccine.
Pfizer’s only large scale trial showed minimal difference in infection, hospitalization, and death rates. Then Pfizer deliberately blew up the control group after two months.
Put another way: any efficacy of the vaccines is almost certainly a mirage created by data manipulation.
Pfizer's 6 month trial report showed significant differences in death rates. Here are links to Pfizer's six month report and supplemental appendix.
Twenty people died in the vaccine group and fourteen died in the control group, but Pfizer said the extra deaths were no big deal so no problem. In table S4 of the supplement, you can see where those extra deaths came from. Nine of the deaths in the vaccine group and five in the placebo were due to cardiovascular failure, or almost double the rate. In these studies all excess deaths in the experiment group are supposed to be attributed to the drug, otherwise what is even the point.
Pfizer knew. The FDA knew. Everyone lied and people died.
Way back in the early days of the pandemic, I remember doctors still openly talking about their observations of Covid patients. They said there were two stages. The first, where it was basically just a bad cold, maybe a moderate flu, in terms of symptoms. Then, in the second stage, the immune system would suddenly go into overdrive, and it was that immune overreaction that was putting people in the ICU.
If any of that was actually true, then I could see how the "vaccine" could actually make it worse. For people who were already going to have an immune response that severe, all it was really doing was prepping the body to go as hard as possible, as fast as possible.
At least, it makes sense to me, as far as one can make any sense out of the available info.
Absolutely correct.
AKA, a Cytokine Storm. And yes, it is one of the major risk factors in WuFlu infections. And we've known for literal decades that coronavirus vaccines don't work because they can trigger cytokine storms when you get actually infected.
from 2007 - Vaccinated ferrets get liver damage exposed to the disease.
from 2011 - Vaccinated mice get their lungs wrecked after virus exposure
from 2016 - Vaccinated rhesus monkeys also have their lungs wrecked after virus exposure
There has never been a successful vaccine against a coronavirus - those we have come up with have always had a risk of severe side effects when you actually encounter the virus. That has been known since SARS first popped up in 2003, if not earlier. And now we get to see the same reactions over the next few years people as we saw for decades in animals.
Simple, it doesn't mitigate symptoms.
I think an oversimplistic explanation is probably that wrt the prevention of severe symptoms, it's still better to have some pre-existing antibody memory queued up even if incomplete and shitty rather than being completely immunologically-naive in the face of a new/first time COVID exposure.
So the shitty and incomplete antibodies produced by the COVID vaccines aren't good enough to prevent viral seeding and replication in the throat and nose following new COVID exposure, but likely can eventually hamper viral replication enough at other sites of the body that it buys time for other slower defenses to engage and prevent more serious consequences than your usual runny nose and sore throat.
Early antibody production addressing the initial infection earlier may also prevent other immune systems from freaking out and overreacting, creating cytokine storms and bad outcomes from self-destruction.