Also, how do you Yank accelbros feel about the Azov way when not hysterizing about your "drafts" and shit?
The Azov movement was founded in 2014 by Andriy Biletsky, former leader of the Ukrainian neo-Nazi group Patriot of Ukraine, during the battle for control of Kyiv’s central Independence Square during the Maidan Revolution against the country’s Russia-leaning, elected president Viktor Yanukovych. Back in 2010, Biletsky claimed that it would one day be Ukraine’s role to “lead the white races of the world in a final crusade… against Semite-led untermenschen“. The revolution, and the war which followed, would give him the national stage for which he had so long craved. (...)
In this, the current war has surely come as a blessed relief for Azov. Biletsky’s attempt to found a political party — the National Corps — met with almost zero success, with even a united bloc of Ukraine’s far- and extreme Right-wing parties failing to clear the very low hurdle for parliamentary representation in the last election: Ukrainian voters simply do not want what they are selling, and reject their worldview. Yet in time of war, Azov and similar groups come to the forefront, with the Russian invasion seemingly reversing the downward spiral that set in for them following Avakov’s resignation due to international pressure. Judging by their social media, Azov’s armed units are expanding: they’re forming new battalions in Kharkiv and Dnipro, a new special forces unit in Kyiv (where Biletsky is organising at least some aspects of the capital’s defence) and local defence militias in western cities such as Ivano-Frankivsk. Along with other extreme Right-wing groups such as Karpatska Sich (whose militancy against Western Ukraine’s Hungarian-speaking minority, including Roma, has drawn criticism from the Hungarian government), the Eastern Orthodox group Tradition and Order, the neo-Nazi group C14, and the extreme Right-wing militia Freikorps, the Russian invasion has allowed Azov to restore its earlier prominence, burnishing its heroic reputation with its dogged defence of Mariupol alongside regular Ukrainian marines. (...)
Senior Azov figures have been explicit, over the course of years, in stating that Ukraine has unique potential as a springboard for the “reconquest” of Europe from liberals, homosexuals and immigrants. While their broader contintental ambitions may have a very doubtful chance of success, a broken, impoverished and angry postwar Ukraine, or worse, a Ukraine suffering years of bombardment and occupation with large areas outside central government control, would surely be a fertile breeding ground for a form of extreme Right-wing militancy not seen in Europe for many decades.
Just like ISIS, Azov doesn't attack jewish targets because they're controlled by the CIA. There's no explanation for their bad optics being hand-waved away when we just lived through six years of everything that vaguely resembled a windmill being mistaken for a swastika. Suddenly all these jews who were very concerned about nazism are silent. Zelensky doesn't feel afraid at all of these people, why isn't he disavowing the neonazis in his military?
They're not in military, they're in police. But even Azov Regiment is actually lite, compared to the Azov movement (who work as only auxiliary police sometimes).
ISIS existed for less than 1 year, it's IS for almost 8 years now. They tried to set up in Lebanon and Palestine, they just got whacked by the rival Islamists and others.
"These Jews" (in America) were crying about Azov all the time. You had even people in the Congress who wanted to designate them International Terrorists.
But there won't be any "nuclear level world war". As always. Not even after Stalin estabilished his No-fly Zone over northernmost Korea, resulting only in a lot of early jet-on-jet dogfighting (and when MacArthur wanted to just nuke the northern side of the Chinese border clear with his novel No-life Zone concept, but was told he was being silly). Operation Unthinkable was named so because it couldn't happen, and thus didn't happen.
Any war between near-peer level countries with nuclear weapons has the potential to become a nuclear war you weirdo. I know you're just tryinb to gaslight people into supporting more American intervention so we can "completely demilitarize" Russia which is "the only true way to end this war", which is a pants on head retarded statement, but you cannot be this ignorant.
I wish the Moscow problem could be settled through talks and the implementation of agreements, but regrettably, this is no longer relevant. Everything can be reversed in a second if Russian and Chinese arms industries continue to pump the current Moscow authorities with state-of-art weapons. That is why the key point is a certain degree of demilitarization of today's Russia, because it is the only objectively controlled factor, which can be monitored and reacted to. Putin would resettle to Havana, Damascus or Beijing, while we would have a heavily armed 'anti-West' next door. This is absolutely unacceptable, in particular, now, that Russia's current leadership has declared its nuclear ambitions.
Because the Russians still aren't sure the Americans (British, French) wouldn't strike back at them. Putin's motto might be, as he says, "the weak get beaten", but after showing a whole lot of weakness over all these years NATO and friends also finally do start to show some strength.
Look at what Trump did when they tested him with their mercenary army by advancing on an American base. What did he do? He smoked them. How did they react? They backed away. The strong don't get beaten.
Because as we know, acceleration through social/political collapse is the exact same thing as nuclear level world war.
Certainly no difference in those two things that could allow for this difference of opinion in people, no sir.
Also, how do you Yank accelbros feel about the Azov way when not hysterizing about your "drafts" and shit?
https://unherd.com/2022/03/the-truth-about-ukraines-nazi-militias/
(Patriot of Ukraine was a more acceptable-sounding name of the Social-National Assembly.)
They’re useful idiots. Ukraine is in no position to ever play a meaningful part in world affairs. It’s just a pawn.
And yet it does now, according to you here even plunging the world into nuclear war no less (you're wrong on this one).
No, they’re just a pawn used by the United States to weaken Russia’s geopolitical position.
Just like ISIS, Azov doesn't attack jewish targets because they're controlled by the CIA. There's no explanation for their bad optics being hand-waved away when we just lived through six years of everything that vaguely resembled a windmill being mistaken for a swastika. Suddenly all these jews who were very concerned about nazism are silent. Zelensky doesn't feel afraid at all of these people, why isn't he disavowing the neonazis in his military?
They're not in military, they're in police. But even Azov Regiment is actually lite, compared to the Azov movement (who work as only auxiliary police sometimes).
ISIS existed for less than 1 year, it's IS for almost 8 years now. They tried to set up in Lebanon and Palestine, they just got whacked by the rival Islamists and others.
"These Jews" (in America) were crying about Azov all the time. You had even people in the Congress who wanted to designate them International Terrorists.
But there won't be any "nuclear level world war". As always. Not even after Stalin estabilished his No-fly Zone over northernmost Korea, resulting only in a lot of early jet-on-jet dogfighting (and when MacArthur wanted to just nuke the northern side of the Chinese border clear with his novel No-life Zone concept, but was told he was being silly). Operation Unthinkable was named so because it couldn't happen, and thus didn't happen.
Any war between near-peer level countries with nuclear weapons has the potential to become a nuclear war you weirdo. I know you're just tryinb to gaslight people into supporting more American intervention so we can "completely demilitarize" Russia which is "the only true way to end this war", which is a pants on head retarded statement, but you cannot be this ignorant.
I wish the Moscow problem could be settled through talks and the implementation of agreements, but regrettably, this is no longer relevant. Everything can be reversed in a second if Russian and Chinese arms industries continue to pump the current Moscow authorities with state-of-art weapons. That is why the key point is a certain degree of demilitarization of today's Russia, because it is the only objectively controlled factor, which can be monitored and reacted to. Putin would resettle to Havana, Damascus or Beijing, while we would have a heavily armed 'anti-West' next door. This is absolutely unacceptable, in particular, now, that Russia's current leadership has declared its nuclear ambitions.
That is an incoherent, rambling mess. America should just occupy all of Russia huh?
I thought you said we would not get into a nuclear war? Where's the consistency?
How can you just blindly assume that there will never be any nuclear war risk if NATO joins Ukraine against Russia?
Because the Russians still aren't sure the Americans (British, French) wouldn't strike back at them. Putin's motto might be, as he says, "the weak get beaten", but after showing a whole lot of weakness over all these years NATO and friends also finally do start to show some strength.
Look at what Trump did when they tested him with their mercenary army by advancing on an American base. What did he do? He smoked them. How did they react? They backed away. The strong don't get beaten.