But there won't be any "nuclear level world war". As always. Not even after Stalin estabilished his No-fly Zone over northernmost Korea, resulting only in a lot of early jet-on-jet dogfighting (and when MacArthur wanted to just nuke the northern side of the Chinese border clear with his novel No-life Zone concept, but was told he was being silly). Operation Unthinkable was named so because it couldn't happen, and thus didn't happen.
Any war between near-peer level countries with nuclear weapons has the potential to become a nuclear war you weirdo. I know you're just tryinb to gaslight people into supporting more American intervention so we can "completely demilitarize" Russia which is "the only true way to end this war", which is a pants on head retarded statement, but you cannot be this ignorant.
I wish the Moscow problem could be settled through talks and the implementation of agreements, but regrettably, this is no longer relevant. Everything can be reversed in a second if Russian and Chinese arms industries continue to pump the current Moscow authorities with state-of-art weapons. That is why the key point is a certain degree of demilitarization of today's Russia, because it is the only objectively controlled factor, which can be monitored and reacted to. Putin would resettle to Havana, Damascus or Beijing, while we would have a heavily armed 'anti-West' next door. This is absolutely unacceptable, in particular, now, that Russia's current leadership has declared its nuclear ambitions.
You think Russia can just nuclear blackmail other nuclear powers and it can be one sided. This is very silly. It's not how it works, it's not how it ever worked.
Because the Russians still aren't sure the Americans (British, French) wouldn't strike back at them. Putin's motto might be, as he says, "the weak get beaten", but after showing a whole lot of weakness over all these years NATO and friends also finally do start to show some strength.
Look at what Trump did when they tested him with their mercenary army by advancing on an American base. What did he do? He smoked them. How did they react? They backed away. The strong don't get beaten.
But there won't be any "nuclear level world war". As always. Not even after Stalin estabilished his No-fly Zone over northernmost Korea, resulting only in a lot of early jet-on-jet dogfighting (and when MacArthur wanted to just nuke the northern side of the Chinese border clear with his novel No-life Zone concept, but was told he was being silly). Operation Unthinkable was named so because it couldn't happen, and thus didn't happen.
Any war between near-peer level countries with nuclear weapons has the potential to become a nuclear war you weirdo. I know you're just tryinb to gaslight people into supporting more American intervention so we can "completely demilitarize" Russia which is "the only true way to end this war", which is a pants on head retarded statement, but you cannot be this ignorant.
I wish the Moscow problem could be settled through talks and the implementation of agreements, but regrettably, this is no longer relevant. Everything can be reversed in a second if Russian and Chinese arms industries continue to pump the current Moscow authorities with state-of-art weapons. That is why the key point is a certain degree of demilitarization of today's Russia, because it is the only objectively controlled factor, which can be monitored and reacted to. Putin would resettle to Havana, Damascus or Beijing, while we would have a heavily armed 'anti-West' next door. This is absolutely unacceptable, in particular, now, that Russia's current leadership has declared its nuclear ambitions.
That is an incoherent, rambling mess. America should just occupy all of Russia huh?
I thought you said we would not get into a nuclear war? Where's the consistency?
How dare you say so about the wisdom of Vladimir Vladimirovich?
https://tass.com/russia/1408629
You think Russia can just nuclear blackmail other nuclear powers and it can be one sided. This is very silly. It's not how it works, it's not how it ever worked.
And it's not called "nuclear war", no.
How can you just blindly assume that there will never be any nuclear war risk if NATO joins Ukraine against Russia?
Because the Russians still aren't sure the Americans (British, French) wouldn't strike back at them. Putin's motto might be, as he says, "the weak get beaten", but after showing a whole lot of weakness over all these years NATO and friends also finally do start to show some strength.
Look at what Trump did when they tested him with their mercenary army by advancing on an American base. What did he do? He smoked them. How did they react? They backed away. The strong don't get beaten.