Just pick up a newspaper. Yeah there's no direct "let's go to war", but you can't really say that, and that's not how propaganda works anymore.
What you'll find is a lot of attention on Ukraine, and a lot of rethoric which logical conclusion is that something should be done, or I sure hope someone somewhere does something.
But of course the washington post or nyt aren't writing these pieces about every conflict in the world. They've picked this one. And they won't let it go. There appears to be some sort of internal messaging saying that this conflict should be escalated. And the question is why. Why is this conflict useful to the cathedral? What is their endgame here? I agree they're not going to go to war against Russia, but they might want to spark a new cold war to justify grabbing new powers, for instance. Ramp up the rethoric to the brink of war, and keep people in the fear that it might happen any day now. And if we're going to war with Russia any day now and Russia backs Trump supporters, and Russia funds the alt-right, and Russia likes the Republicans, and Russia gave money to the truckers, etc. etc. etc. Well then you can imagine how a cold war could be useful in justifying going after your political opposition.
A lot of it is between the lines, which is possibly why a non-native speaker wouldn't pick up on it. And I'm not saying that's the end goal - but this is the kind of conversation people are aiming for when they ask; why is the left egging for war? They're not asking for some autist to repeat how there's not going to be a war!!1!11!!! Yeah, we know that. Calm down.
Also maybe if you ask people instead of telling them they won't percive you as being such a twat.
Does it take effort to be this retarded or do they put something in the water to make you eurofags like this?
Why is it so difficult for you to understand that these statements are aimed at the people who say we should be going to war not that we are.
Who? Just who the fuck do you think tells you to "go to war"? Even Ukraine doesn't. We don't. No one does.
Where did this noise come from?
The American left you retard. The people we've been talking about this entire time
I know eurofags are ignorant but holy shit.
hot damn this mutt's seething
Show me this "American left", all I see is them supporting Russian imperialism in the name of anti-imperialism.
Specifically, them saying you should "go to war" no less.
The 2 biggest names you can find.
What they're trying to tell you is that in the states a lot of leftists are egging for war, and the question is; why? What's their motivation?
If you calm down you'll see that you're going off on tangents.
Yeah, I told you you to show me just 2 (two) of such people you claim to exist in "lot".
The 2 biggest names.
I wasn't the person you were talking to.
Just pick up a newspaper. Yeah there's no direct "let's go to war", but you can't really say that, and that's not how propaganda works anymore.
What you'll find is a lot of attention on Ukraine, and a lot of rethoric which logical conclusion is that something should be done, or I sure hope someone somewhere does something.
But of course the washington post or nyt aren't writing these pieces about every conflict in the world. They've picked this one. And they won't let it go. There appears to be some sort of internal messaging saying that this conflict should be escalated. And the question is why. Why is this conflict useful to the cathedral? What is their endgame here? I agree they're not going to go to war against Russia, but they might want to spark a new cold war to justify grabbing new powers, for instance. Ramp up the rethoric to the brink of war, and keep people in the fear that it might happen any day now. And if we're going to war with Russia any day now and Russia backs Trump supporters, and Russia funds the alt-right, and Russia likes the Republicans, and Russia gave money to the truckers, etc. etc. etc. Well then you can imagine how a cold war could be useful in justifying going after your political opposition.
A lot of it is between the lines, which is possibly why a non-native speaker wouldn't pick up on it. And I'm not saying that's the end goal - but this is the kind of conversation people are aiming for when they ask; why is the left egging for war? They're not asking for some autist to repeat how there's not going to be a war!!1!11!!! Yeah, we know that. Calm down.
Also maybe if you ask people instead of telling them they won't percive you as being such a twat.