As I've said before to you, National Socialism was supported by women, propped up the value of women and was the German answer to people asking why women were doing sick acts during the collapse of the Weimar Republic post Wall Street Crash.
In short, your ideology came from people too obsessed with a delusion to admit that women could be bad people.
But it didn't. That's why they blamed the loss of women's "virtue" on Jewish influence.
That's what the book burnings were about, the idea that if you make bad words disappear, you don't have to hold people accountable for acting on them.
People still use the same arguments now - that women are just brainwashed to support the anti-male policy today.
To them I give only one example that definitively proves you cannot spend your way into being supported.
The Michael Bloomberg for President campaign.
Remember it? Hundreds of millions spent on advertising, paying shills on Instagram to connect with young people.
American Samoa was all he got and that only counts in the Democrat primary. He'd have won zero states in a Presidential Election, no matter what he spent.
I recognized your username.
Don't get too excited.
You wrote the point without me being involved.
You're already half way there, my friend.
Once you pass through the tunnel of "it was women" you'll arrive at the most logical conclusion.
Not really.
As I've said before to you, National Socialism was supported by women, propped up the value of women and was the German answer to people asking why women were doing sick acts during the collapse of the Weimar Republic post Wall Street Crash.
In short, your ideology came from people too obsessed with a delusion to admit that women could be bad people.
Not at all.
The NatSoc movement knew well that women could be evil.
You misunderstand the point of my words and instead equate it with a specific ideology.
It's okay.
You'll soon work past it.
Truth itself shall guide your hand.
But it didn't. That's why they blamed the loss of women's "virtue" on Jewish influence.
That's what the book burnings were about, the idea that if you make bad words disappear, you don't have to hold people accountable for acting on them.
People still use the same arguments now - that women are just brainwashed to support the anti-male policy today.
To them I give only one example that definitively proves you cannot spend your way into being supported.
The Michael Bloomberg for President campaign.
Remember it? Hundreds of millions spent on advertising, paying shills on Instagram to connect with young people.
American Samoa was all he got and that only counts in the Democrat primary. He'd have won zero states in a Presidential Election, no matter what he spent.
Same for when you stop blaming everything from the rain to your stubbed toe on da Joooz.
I don't blame it all on da juice.
I just point out their inordinate influence and in-group preference.