Some pretty fashy stuff from Azov guys shows up on Telegram. It doesn't bother me, but it's more than fakie-pedia. The point is that the media cries about fascism all day, but suddenly doesn't care about this particular group.
There's been a lot of mud slinging among the English journos, including a recent big hitpiece in TIME magazine ("Like, Share, Recruit: How a White-Supremacist Militia Uses Facebook to Radicalize and Train New Members" published on January 7).
And you know what? The Russian Wikipedia article is actually pretty damn good - factual, informative, and even written quite from a neutral POV and yet still with several tags that things should be rewritten more neutrally in some sections. I'm positively surprised.
Along with the symbols, the meaning of which can be interpreted ambiguously, individual members and groups of the Azov regiment also use the symbols of the 36th SS Grenadier Division "Dirlewanger" as insignia[179][180]. Due to the fact that the units of the division as part of the SS Sonder-Regiment "Dirlewanger" were directly involved in the suppression of the Warsaw Uprising and other punitive actions on the Eastern Front, some Polish media expressed concern about the use of this symbolism by the Azov fighters[181][182].
Didn't know this one, someone tried to be way too edgy indeed.
I don't take my information from Wikipedia this is just an example. There is a plethora of evidence to be found online of what their views are and ideologies
My account age is irrelevant anyone can go look up this group themselves and decide what they think of it. Linking their own website where they write anything they want is irrelevant and not an accurate portrayal of any group or actions.
You are a pole who supports the current government in Ukraine and supported the regime change done there half a decade ago
Your agenda is clear trying to avoid anyone seeing what azov batallion views are so you can attempt to maintain support of them. This is exactly what places like the Atlantic council do
People are free to look up the name they see now and make up their mind of what they think
It's not "literally a battalion", it's literally a regiment and it's not "called battalion". Ever since September 17, 2014.
And stop taking your "informantion" on anything remotely political in any way from Wikipedia.
Some pretty fashy stuff from Azov guys shows up on Telegram. It doesn't bother me, but it's more than fakie-pedia. The point is that the media cries about fascism all day, but suddenly doesn't care about this particular group.
There's been a lot of mud slinging among the English journos, including a recent big hitpiece in TIME magazine ("Like, Share, Recruit: How a White-Supremacist Militia Uses Facebook to Radicalize and Train New Members" published on January 7).
Ukrainian Wikipedia, I don't read it at all but at least the title is correct: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Окремий_загін_спеціального_призначення_НГУ_«Азов»
He'll, even the Ruski version makes the most basic fact (the unit's name) correct:
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Азов_(полк)
And you know what? The Russian Wikipedia article is actually pretty damn good - factual, informative, and even written quite from a neutral POV and yet still with several tags that things should be rewritten more neutrally in some sections. I'm positively surprised.
Didn't know this one, someone tried to be way too edgy indeed.
I don't take my information from Wikipedia this is just an example. There is a plethora of evidence to be found online of what their views are and ideologies
Yeah, they're easily "found online" indeed: https://azov.org.ua/
And yet you linked to English Wikipedia like a tard.
No linking a website where a group can write anything they want about themselves is not a accurate description of views and ideology
Okay handshake account, now you can go back to Wikipedia then, where openly communist Wikipedos "can write anything they want" about anything.
My account age is irrelevant anyone can go look up this group themselves and decide what they think of it. Linking their own website where they write anything they want is irrelevant and not an accurate portrayal of any group or actions.
I told you, you should go back.
You are a pole who supports the current government in Ukraine and supported the regime change done there half a decade ago
Your agenda is clear trying to avoid anyone seeing what azov batallion views are so you can attempt to maintain support of them. This is exactly what places like the Atlantic council do
People are free to look up the name they see now and make up their mind of what they think
I can see your comment history here about Ukraine
Yeah if I was Russian disinformation this is what I put on a Wikipedia page.
Post Removed: OP, we ask that new users engage in the comment section first for a while before posting new threads.
And no more than 5 posts per day.