How does the safeguarding of children from porn put LGBT+ lives at risk?
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
So what you are saying is that there is no downside?
This already exists. Except it happens slightly more subtly in the form of "hate speech" or "incitement" rules that only happen to be enforced against those who are opposed to the regime. Maybe the government didn't explicitly order big tech to "take out Alex Jones" but was the effect of what happened to him any different than if it did?
At this point I'm getting pretty tired of losing. If adopting the enemy's principle of "anything that hurts my enemy is good, anything that helps him is bad" means winning then so be it. Survive first, regain our humanity afterwards.
Degenerates like porn, and money made from porn support my enemies. Making it harder to access reinforces the culture I want. Therefore this is only a good thing.
The difference is, the current form of it, requires them to have the burden of proof.
They have to Investigstet, collect and prove beyond a doubt. It can be challenged in court and people can slip the net.
This new bill means we incriminate ourselves. Worse still we incriminate our selves for potential FutureCrime of crimes that are not yet law.
Your name is in a register that they can use to blackmail you over and if the law changes go "AHA!"
There are no downsides and here's why that's a problem....