Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

35
Laila Mickelwait of exodus cry was caught sharing child porn. (mobile.twitter.com)
posted 4 years ago by AbleistSL 4 years ago by AbleistSL +35 / -0
35 comments share
35 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
▲ 5 ▼
– DomitiusOfMassilia 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

No, you haven't. You posted the concept of imminence, and declared that to be the standard for which all violent speech must meet, which isn't possible online. You are asking me to change Rule 2 such that it would allow you to directly threaten to kill users because it's not imminent.

Furthermore, you are not the arbiter of these words. You assertion is what you want it to meet, not what any of the words actually mean. You are acting solely in bad faith.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Ahaus667 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Imminence and production are the two standards required by law to be considered violent speech. You are complaining because actually following these standards would not allow you to act as you see fit. Saying that someone should kill someone and dox them does fall under this criteria. Saying someone should die does not. Again rule 2 falls under rule 1 if it was applied to the standard of law.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– DomitiusOfMassilia 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Saying that someone should kill someone and dox them does fall under this criteria.

No it doesn't, that's not imminence. You're lucky to even get conspiracy.

You are not applying the law. You are just making assertions, and you are not engaging in good faith.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Ahaus667 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Actually it does, this falls under incitement. Once again you’re not even trying to apply the actual legal terms because you don’t want to lose the ability to arbitrate subjectively.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy