Has anybody here read RFK's book yet? It's said to be a complete barn burner with Fraudci ignited righteously.
Maybe we should do KIA2 book review on it ... or maybe I'm not ready to plow through that much legalese and documentation at this point in my reading life.
At a very high level, Fauci has been a fraud since AIDS and reformed his image by strategically spready funding around. Pharma has been playing fast and loose with vaccine safety for decades. Pharma, FDA, NIH and journals have incestuous financial ties that result in pharma getting the result it wants; in the rare case that something does get banned as dangerous they dump it on Africa and still make billions.
As a scientist with a background in high-level R&D in pharma, they knew. We all knew for a while that mRNA “vaccine” technology was too early to be used by, at best, about 5 additional years. mRNA can also be used to facilitate promiscuous protein binding by forming scaffolds and allowing protein-protein interactions that under normal circumstances would never occur.
Without going into too much detail to point where I’ve worked in the past, a project of great interest was an enzymatic treatment to breakdown RNA being shot out of dying cells in portions of the heart affected by a heart attack. Reason being is the RNA would cause weird protein interactions leading to signaling cascades that promoted apoptosis in the penumbras of the MI site. The drug was shelved as far as I remember, but it worked well in models.
Can I ask if you believe it is possible to make a vaccine that would inflict harm on solely men and leave women completely unharmed or with minor side effects?
This is outside my paygrade as I was a molecular biologist not a genomics/genetics boy, but it is conceivable if you had something targeted specifically to interfere with or activate in response to genes encoded on the Y chromosome. It could be done, but again I’m unsure if it would be possible to have that function as a vaccine. Plus, there would be at least one person in the review process who would suss that out and throw red flags.
Has anybody here read RFK's book yet? It's said to be a complete barn burner with Fraudci ignited righteously.
Maybe we should do KIA2 book review on it ... or maybe I'm not ready to plow through that much legalese and documentation at this point in my reading life.
I'm probably 3/4th of the way through with it. It's actually a fairly easy read.
Tell us more ~
At a very high level, Fauci has been a fraud since AIDS and reformed his image by strategically spready funding around. Pharma has been playing fast and loose with vaccine safety for decades. Pharma, FDA, NIH and journals have incestuous financial ties that result in pharma getting the result it wants; in the rare case that something does get banned as dangerous they dump it on Africa and still make billions.
Hell, that little hook nosed goblin has probably done worse than that. This is just what they've been able to find.
I'm still hoping they find something that proves the CDC knew about myocarditis before the jab was approved.
As a scientist with a background in high-level R&D in pharma, they knew. We all knew for a while that mRNA “vaccine” technology was too early to be used by, at best, about 5 additional years. mRNA can also be used to facilitate promiscuous protein binding by forming scaffolds and allowing protein-protein interactions that under normal circumstances would never occur.
Without going into too much detail to point where I’ve worked in the past, a project of great interest was an enzymatic treatment to breakdown RNA being shot out of dying cells in portions of the heart affected by a heart attack. Reason being is the RNA would cause weird protein interactions leading to signaling cascades that promoted apoptosis in the penumbras of the MI site. The drug was shelved as far as I remember, but it worked well in models.
Can I ask if you believe it is possible to make a vaccine that would inflict harm on solely men and leave women completely unharmed or with minor side effects?
This is outside my paygrade as I was a molecular biologist not a genomics/genetics boy, but it is conceivable if you had something targeted specifically to interfere with or activate in response to genes encoded on the Y chromosome. It could be done, but again I’m unsure if it would be possible to have that function as a vaccine. Plus, there would be at least one person in the review process who would suss that out and throw red flags.
I'm just wondering because of the myocarditis cases and how skewed towards men being harmed they are.
The fact that Pfizer's lead scientist and the FDA, CDC chairs are all feminist women means the regulators wouldn't want to stop it.