Can I ask if you believe it is possible to make a vaccine that would inflict harm on solely men and leave women completely unharmed or with minor side effects?
This is outside my paygrade as I was a molecular biologist not a genomics/genetics boy, but it is conceivable if you had something targeted specifically to interfere with or activate in response to genes encoded on the Y chromosome. It could be done, but again I’m unsure if it would be possible to have that function as a vaccine. Plus, there would be at least one person in the review process who would suss that out and throw red flags.
Can I ask if you believe it is possible to make a vaccine that would inflict harm on solely men and leave women completely unharmed or with minor side effects?
This is outside my paygrade as I was a molecular biologist not a genomics/genetics boy, but it is conceivable if you had something targeted specifically to interfere with or activate in response to genes encoded on the Y chromosome. It could be done, but again I’m unsure if it would be possible to have that function as a vaccine. Plus, there would be at least one person in the review process who would suss that out and throw red flags.
I'm just wondering because of the myocarditis cases and how skewed towards men being harmed they are.
The fact that Pfizer's lead scientist and the FDA, CDC chairs are all feminist women means the regulators wouldn't want to stop it.