As a scientist with a background in high-level R&D in pharma, they knew. We all knew for a while that mRNA “vaccine” technology was too early to be used by, at best, about 5 additional years. mRNA can also be used to facilitate promiscuous protein binding by forming scaffolds and allowing protein-protein interactions that under normal circumstances would never occur.
Without going into too much detail to point where I’ve worked in the past, a project of great interest was an enzymatic treatment to breakdown RNA being shot out of dying cells in portions of the heart affected by a heart attack. Reason being is the RNA would cause weird protein interactions leading to signaling cascades that promoted apoptosis in the penumbras of the MI site. The drug was shelved as far as I remember, but it worked well in models.
Can I ask if you believe it is possible to make a vaccine that would inflict harm on solely men and leave women completely unharmed or with minor side effects?
This is outside my paygrade as I was a molecular biologist not a genomics/genetics boy, but it is conceivable if you had something targeted specifically to interfere with or activate in response to genes encoded on the Y chromosome. It could be done, but again I’m unsure if it would be possible to have that function as a vaccine. Plus, there would be at least one person in the review process who would suss that out and throw red flags.
I'm still hoping they find something that proves the CDC knew about myocarditis before the jab was approved.
As a scientist with a background in high-level R&D in pharma, they knew. We all knew for a while that mRNA “vaccine” technology was too early to be used by, at best, about 5 additional years. mRNA can also be used to facilitate promiscuous protein binding by forming scaffolds and allowing protein-protein interactions that under normal circumstances would never occur.
Without going into too much detail to point where I’ve worked in the past, a project of great interest was an enzymatic treatment to breakdown RNA being shot out of dying cells in portions of the heart affected by a heart attack. Reason being is the RNA would cause weird protein interactions leading to signaling cascades that promoted apoptosis in the penumbras of the MI site. The drug was shelved as far as I remember, but it worked well in models.
Can I ask if you believe it is possible to make a vaccine that would inflict harm on solely men and leave women completely unharmed or with minor side effects?
This is outside my paygrade as I was a molecular biologist not a genomics/genetics boy, but it is conceivable if you had something targeted specifically to interfere with or activate in response to genes encoded on the Y chromosome. It could be done, but again I’m unsure if it would be possible to have that function as a vaccine. Plus, there would be at least one person in the review process who would suss that out and throw red flags.
I'm just wondering because of the myocarditis cases and how skewed towards men being harmed they are.
The fact that Pfizer's lead scientist and the FDA, CDC chairs are all feminist women means the regulators wouldn't want to stop it.