So, in Ontario, those currently "fully" vaccinated are actually slightly more likely to get xiflu than those with no shots whatsoever.
My hypothesis is that the government is telling everyone to get "boosted", which we know lowers the effectivness of the immune system for days, or even weeks. So we obviously see cases spike because the government is encouraging people to cripple their immune systems during a spike in cases. It's interesting to note that the "partially" vaxxed have a much lower case rate than either; probably because their immune systems aren't currently compromised and they aren't being tested because they're considered "vaxxed".
At this point it's getting very hard to justify the governments actions with stupidity. We've got leaky jabs causing mutations and variants (predictably), when the variants blow up the government does everything it can to drive the case rate higher.
My guess is vaccines offer moderate protection for 4 to 6 months, during which unvaccinated people develop more natural immunity, which lasts longer and is more effective than the vaccines.
When vaccinated people are 4 to 6 months out of their shot, they now have less immunity than an unvaccinated group.
Same statistical trend happened in the UK earlier, because the UK vaccinated earlier.
So far there is zero evidence they offer any protection, but there is mounting evidence they do the opposite.
We still have ZERO placebo studies made available to the public to know for a fact that they do anything at all other than cripple immune systems and come with lots of side-effects.
Most people claiming the vaccines "work" in any capacity only have unreliable and misconstrued infection/hospital rates to go by, which really speaks nothing to the efficacy of the drugs themselves due to the amount of variables involved with gauging the increase/decrease of infection/hospital rates.
Most of Africa is unvaccinated-
They were telling the world that this variant is mild for months…
Leaky vaccines CREATE MORE DANGEROUS variants (see my post from geert vanden bossche)
So, in Ontario, those currently "fully" vaccinated are actually slightly more likely to get xiflu than those with no shots whatsoever.
My hypothesis is that the government is telling everyone to get "boosted", which we know lowers the effectivness of the immune system for days, or even weeks. So we obviously see cases spike because the government is encouraging people to cripple their immune systems during a spike in cases. It's interesting to note that the "partially" vaxxed have a much lower case rate than either; probably because their immune systems aren't currently compromised and they aren't being tested because they're considered "vaxxed".
At this point it's getting very hard to justify the governments actions with stupidity. We've got leaky jabs causing mutations and variants (predictably), when the variants blow up the government does everything it can to drive the case rate higher.
My guess is vaccines offer moderate protection for 4 to 6 months, during which unvaccinated people develop more natural immunity, which lasts longer and is more effective than the vaccines.
When vaccinated people are 4 to 6 months out of their shot, they now have less immunity than an unvaccinated group.
Same statistical trend happened in the UK earlier, because the UK vaccinated earlier.
So far there is zero evidence they offer any protection, but there is mounting evidence they do the opposite.
We still have ZERO placebo studies made available to the public to know for a fact that they do anything at all other than cripple immune systems and come with lots of side-effects.
Most people claiming the vaccines "work" in any capacity only have unreliable and misconstrued infection/hospital rates to go by, which really speaks nothing to the efficacy of the drugs themselves due to the amount of variables involved with gauging the increase/decrease of infection/hospital rates.