He's not wrong. Western educations systems have gone down the shitter trying to appeal to the lowest common denominator and constantly importing ever lower denominators.
Pretty much. The root problem is that IQ isn't distributed between racial groups in a politically correct manner, so any attempt to separate kids by ability (IQ) is "racist" because that would reflect the IQ distribution that no one wants to talk about. Schools aren't allowed to use discipline anymore either, since most of the miscreants belong to sacred classes. The end result is shitty education for anyone unable to afford private school, and a warzone for anyone unfortunate enough to live in a "diverse" district.
McCarthy's mistake was blaming Moscow as the source of subversion when the real enemies were in Harvard. Western education institutions must be burned to the ground. Republicucks missed a great opportunity to pay the teachers to stay home forever where they can never harm another child. At the risk of appearing to simp for the slants, Chinese schools aren't trying to sterilize the kids, so they got that going for them.
From about 1965 to 1995, American high schools essentially froze their vocational programs. When they finally acknowledged that the world has changed, they spent another 20 years trying to figure out how to catch up.
The problem is the school districts. Yes, I understand this goes back to home-rule principles but it has multiple consequences.
In the face of the technological changes occurring in the 20th century, the ONLY practical way of schools keeping their vocational programs competitive would have been to specialize and open enroll. This did happen... but only in the very largest metro systems that control multiple high schools under a single district.
Districts with a single high school (including poor and rich districts in major metro suburbs as well as rural schools) couldn't specialize and so had to hand vocational skills off to community colleges and universities.
Had there been a stronger state level top down education system, high schools could have moved to a residence model with subject matter specialization (as is the case in some European countries). So in a given state you might have some arts high schools, lots of technology high schools, medical and law preparatory high schools, etc.
As it is, a person has to go to community college to even learn how to drive a goddamn truck.
Part of the problem is of course that America picked 18 as age of majority instead of 16 like most of Europe. That causes problems for running boarding style high schools.
He's not wrong. Western educations systems have gone down the shitter trying to appeal to the lowest common denominator and constantly importing ever lower denominators.
Pretty much. The root problem is that IQ isn't distributed between racial groups in a politically correct manner, so any attempt to separate kids by ability (IQ) is "racist" because that would reflect the IQ distribution that no one wants to talk about. Schools aren't allowed to use discipline anymore either, since most of the miscreants belong to sacred classes. The end result is shitty education for anyone unable to afford private school, and a warzone for anyone unfortunate enough to live in a "diverse" district.
I don't give a shit either way this isn't a Let's talk about Trump forum.
McCarthy's mistake was blaming Moscow as the source of subversion when the real enemies were in Harvard. Western education institutions must be burned to the ground. Republicucks missed a great opportunity to pay the teachers to stay home forever where they can never harm another child. At the risk of appearing to simp for the slants, Chinese schools aren't trying to sterilize the kids, so they got that going for them.
Now why are you so obsessed with Trump handshake?
Rent Free...
From about 1965 to 1995, American high schools essentially froze their vocational programs. When they finally acknowledged that the world has changed, they spent another 20 years trying to figure out how to catch up.
The problem is the school districts. Yes, I understand this goes back to home-rule principles but it has multiple consequences.
In the face of the technological changes occurring in the 20th century, the ONLY practical way of schools keeping their vocational programs competitive would have been to specialize and open enroll. This did happen... but only in the very largest metro systems that control multiple high schools under a single district.
Districts with a single high school (including poor and rich districts in major metro suburbs as well as rural schools) couldn't specialize and so had to hand vocational skills off to community colleges and universities.
Had there been a stronger state level top down education system, high schools could have moved to a residence model with subject matter specialization (as is the case in some European countries). So in a given state you might have some arts high schools, lots of technology high schools, medical and law preparatory high schools, etc.
As it is, a person has to go to community college to even learn how to drive a goddamn truck.
Part of the problem is of course that America picked 18 as age of majority instead of 16 like most of Europe. That causes problems for running boarding style high schools.
Is Trump even wrong?
Handshakes get drawn and quartered too.
Post Reported for: Rule 11 - Spam
OP, I need you to contribute more with comments before you start posting.