When you get above 60 you're getting into higher risk categories. If you're over 80 you're at even higher risk, and most over 80 have underlying health conditions where the jab starts to make some sense because you're at an actual risk of WuFlu
You're right that 60+ does include higher risk for various co-morbidities, and you're absolutely right that a vaccine would make sense for people over 80... if the there were actually vaccines available that worked.
Unfortunately, these things floating around that people are being mandated to take aren't vaccines, and they there is no data available showing that they have any efficacy at all when controlling for the data (because the control group was contaminated by Big Pharma).
Essentially anyone saying the vaccines are effective are begging the question, because there is no longitudinal data available showing their effective.
They work (in that they can reduce severity of symptoms, not in that they prevent you from getting it), just not as well or as safely as advertised.
Informed consent is about truthful & transparent info so people can calculate the risks and make their own decision. This includes the truth about how deadly the virus itself is too.
I probably wouldn't trust this shit even if I was twice as old with more co-morbidities, but I could understand others would.
Unless they are 60+, that is nothing to brag about, only a marker of their obedience.
I hate that you keep lying about this based on what you've been fed from CNN.
There is zero benefit for anyone 60+ get vaccinated or the booster shot.
And you have zero longitudinal data to back up your baseless point.
When you get above 60 you're getting into higher risk categories. If you're over 80 you're at even higher risk, and most over 80 have underlying health conditions where the jab starts to make some sense because you're at an actual risk of WuFlu
You're right that 60+ does include higher risk for various co-morbidities, and you're absolutely right that a vaccine would make sense for people over 80... if the there were actually vaccines available that worked.
Unfortunately, these things floating around that people are being mandated to take aren't vaccines, and they there is no data available showing that they have any efficacy at all when controlling for the data (because the control group was contaminated by Big Pharma).
Essentially anyone saying the vaccines are effective are begging the question, because there is no longitudinal data available showing their effective.
In fact, even the zeitgeist are admitting they are ineffective because they're claiming now that you need the boosters to be considered fully vaccinated against every new variant: https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/584943-fauci-when-not-if-definition-of-fully-vaccinated-will-change
They work (in that they can reduce severity of symptoms, not in that they prevent you from getting it), just not as well or as safely as advertised.
Informed consent is about truthful & transparent info so people can calculate the risks and make their own decision. This includes the truth about how deadly the virus itself is too.
I probably wouldn't trust this shit even if I was twice as old with more co-morbidities, but I could understand others would.
The Israeli data says otherwise.
Now do Israeli excess all cause mortality.
I don't know about that.
What longitudinal Israeli data? Link to the Phase III and Phase IV data trials for the boosters.
There is zero benefit for anyone 60+ get vaccinated or the booster shot.