Hitler allowed for capital he gave individual liberties to people to choose production outside of the war effort and promoting national interests
False.
„You have no idea how far state control goes and how much power the Nazi representatives have over our work... In this respect they certainly differ from the former Social-Democratic officials. These Nazi radicals think of nothing except ‘distributing the wealth.’ Some businessmen have even started studying Marxist theories, so that they will have a better understanding of the present economic system.“ — Günter Reimann
Source: The Vampire Economy: Doing Business Under Fascism, 2014, p. 6 (letter from a German businessman)>
National Socialism to be the final form of capitalism.
They are retarded if they think capitalism leads to socialism.
they're actually very wrong in that regard
They couldn't be more wrong even if they tried.
Something Hitler very much opposed
Well, he did support the idea of controlling the world with the soviets.
You can kill people with knives and then reuse them
Not reliably.
And gas... what does it take to manufacture gas? Sounds resource intensive to me.
When you use it for other things and have a large supply of it, not a problem.
They are already doing it, by doing exactly what the democrats are doing to you and the unvaccinated. On that note, you should like it, after all it was what Hitler did to Jews.
No, it is not fascist, not yet. It is showing some signs of it, with democrats colluding with private corporations.
Leftism and National Socialism are fundamentally different at the moral level
Not really; They are the same.
Socialism, degeneracy, censorship, death, your property not being yours...
Other scholars have examined the
abuse of children by German soldiers; however, they have not examined in detail the
ways in which male and female children were conceived of by the German military and
Nazi regime, nor have they analyzed the ways in which abusers were discussed.32
Although the law against the sexual abuse of children, §176 section 3,329 gives the
age of consent as 14, which means all sexual contact with a child under that age was to be
legally punished, what the documents indicate is if the judges or accused believed the
child looked over 14, charges of child abuse were not lodged, or could be dismissed.
Furthermore, the judges believed female children could entice soldiers into sexual
activity; they were held responsible for the sexual abuse, although that belief was counter
to the law. Moreover, determinations of punishment were not based on whether a
standard of evidence had been met, on whether the soldier had sexually abused a minor,
but rather on the perceived effect of that abuse. Mitigating circumstances could be
offered if the judge believed the girl to be un-traumatized by the abuse and if the judge
believed the girl had not been morally damaged; there is never an explanation of how a
female child should have behaved to demonstrate trauma, nor is there an explanation of
how moral damage was gauged.330
...
By contrast, those men believed to be good soldiers, to have
adhered to norms of military, German, and Nazi masculinity were often favored with
excuses that could result in a lesser punishment. In cases of child abuse, parallel
mitigating factors were available for men who abused female children and female
children were subject to gendered evaluations of behavior. If female children were found
to have acted in some way contrary to expectations, or if they were physically developed
beyond their age, according to the judge, they were frequently blamed for having
instigated the sexual contact; the judges also believed that they were, as sexually
experienced individuals, less traumatized by sexual violence
...
Rape was not a concern for the Nazi party, nor
was the prosecution of incest, and after an initial spike in rates of criminality for the
abuse of children, there was a decline in the late 1930s. The decline in prosecution of
cases in which women and children were the primary victims—rape, incest, and
violations of §176 section 3—suggest to Dickinson, that “[d]espite their rhetoric, the
Nazis were not in truth terribly committed to the family.”3
False
https://mises.org/library/myth-nazi-capitalism
fascism is socialism with capitalist veneer.
https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Fascism.html
False.
They are retarded if they think capitalism leads to socialism.
They couldn't be more wrong even if they tried.
Well, he did support the idea of controlling the world with the soviets.
Not reliably.
When you use it for other things and have a large supply of it, not a problem.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zyklon_B
And a byproduct to many things: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_cyanide
HCN is produced on an industrial scale and is a highly valued precursor to many chemical compounds ranging from polymers to pharmaceuticals
Prove it. I have shown the evidence, you didn't even bother going through it. Therefore I will dismiss your propaganda comment right here.
PS: Don't you dare quote your brother's, the communists, propaganda from historical revisionists like Jacobin,
They are already doing it, by doing exactly what the democrats are doing to you and the unvaccinated. On that note, you should like it, after all it was what Hitler did to Jews.
No, it is not fascist, not yet. It is showing some signs of it, with democrats colluding with private corporations.
Not really; They are the same.
Socialism, degeneracy, censorship, death, your property not being yours...
Other scholars have examined the abuse of children by German soldiers; however, they have not examined in detail the ways in which male and female children were conceived of by the German military and Nazi regime, nor have they analyzed the ways in which abusers were discussed.32
Although the law against the sexual abuse of children, §176 section 3,329 gives the age of consent as 14, which means all sexual contact with a child under that age was to be legally punished, what the documents indicate is if the judges or accused believed the child looked over 14, charges of child abuse were not lodged, or could be dismissed. Furthermore, the judges believed female children could entice soldiers into sexual activity; they were held responsible for the sexual abuse, although that belief was counter to the law. Moreover, determinations of punishment were not based on whether a standard of evidence had been met, on whether the soldier had sexually abused a minor, but rather on the perceived effect of that abuse. Mitigating circumstances could be offered if the judge believed the girl to be un-traumatized by the abuse and if the judge believed the girl had not been morally damaged; there is never an explanation of how a female child should have behaved to demonstrate trauma, nor is there an explanation of how moral damage was gauged.330
...
By contrast, those men believed to be good soldiers, to have adhered to norms of military, German, and Nazi masculinity were often favored with excuses that could result in a lesser punishment. In cases of child abuse, parallel mitigating factors were available for men who abused female children and female children were subject to gendered evaluations of behavior. If female children were found to have acted in some way contrary to expectations, or if they were physically developed beyond their age, according to the judge, they were frequently blamed for having instigated the sexual contact; the judges also believed that they were, as sexually experienced individuals, less traumatized by sexual violence
...
Rape was not a concern for the Nazi party, nor was the prosecution of incest, and after an initial spike in rates of criminality for the abuse of children, there was a decline in the late 1930s. The decline in prosecution of cases in which women and children were the primary victims—rape, incest, and violations of §176 section 3—suggest to Dickinson, that “[d]espite their rhetoric, the Nazis were not in truth terribly committed to the family.”3
https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_etd/send_file/send?accession=kent1258726022&disposition=inline