Why don't you go shill somewhere else? We're not buying what you're selling.

For myself:

1. At the time, I was told the 2-dose regimen would be sufficient. Call it what you want (science changing, misinformation, politicians lying through their teeth, whatever) but there was some level of false pretenses with the initial shot

2. I'm in better health now than when I got the first shot, and in my age range the risk was already minimal so screw it, I'll take my chances with the disease rather than consent to booster shots every few months for the next few years if not the rest of my life.

3. Telling people they need to get a vaccine for an illness with a tiny fatality risk (unless you're a senior citizen with pre-existing health conditions) or they'll not be allowed to work anymore is beyond malicious. And evil must be opposed.

You should still have memory cells even if you aren't producing antibodies so your adaptive immune response should only take ~five days rather than ~fifteen to ramp up. As someone who also got the shot and won't get the boost, fuck that, I was sold on 90% effective against INFECTION and what we got is something that is ineffective against infection but may keep you from dying if you bOOOOOOst so no I am not taking something that seems to cause heart damage. The scarring from myocarditis never goes away so even if it's fairly minor from one shot it accumulates if they are sticking you twice a year.

If you go back through my post history you'll see I used to be pro-vaccine (for anyone who isn't young) but those saying this is being treated like a livestock vaccine were on the fucking money. It doesn't work that well but it keeps you alive long enough to be slaughtered; food animals don't have to worry about side effects.

Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods

Comment Approved: That's not how this rule works.