Daily reminder we live in an absurd parody
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (67)
sorted by:
It does. I have a distant relative with a severe hormonal imbalance. They are technically fertile, but can't be bothered to fuck.
So they are sick . . . ie not naturally like that . . .
Sexuality is completely determined by hormonal values, so it is only natural to conclude different sexualities (or the lack thereof) are possible without being immediately labeled 'sick'.
Also, people are born with defects all the time. Is a person with six toes also sick? Is a person with no sex drive sick?
Yes they are sick in the sense that we deem it to be deviant or defect. A person with six toes either gets one removed or buys specialty shoes to accommodate their defective feet. They don't get Nike ads proclaiming how they are changing the face of footwear by making sure all shoes can accommodate six toes now.
For fuck's sake this isn't that hard.
Apparently it is very hard, because your concept of what 'sick' means is way the hell off.
Sickness and deviance go hand in hand, but aren't synonymous. You can be defective but not be sick at all. Arguing otherwise just derails your own argument.