Freedom requires sacrifice. Giving into a threat even though you really super duper don't want to is compliance. You want what they offer more than you want bodily autonomy.
Just like the actors and actresses who sucked dick to get a role.
Whether it's "compliance" or not doesn't make it "consent" in any real usage of the word.
Consenting under duress is not consent at all.
No, I don't want what they offer, I don't want them to take away what I already have. The government didn't "offer" me my freedom. But they are able to take it away.
Consent occurs when one person voluntarily agrees to the proposal or desires of another. If you take an experimental gene therapy product to keep your job, that is absolutely voluntary. That is their offer; consent to maintain your current lifestyle or be inconvenienced and find a new job. You are choosing comfort and safety over maintaining your own bodily autonomy. If your boss said suck my dick or you're fired; I hope you make it clear you are under duress while you fondle his balls.
You don't have or deserve any freedoms you aren't willing to make a sacrifice for. I get it, it's an extremely difficult choice. But if all you are going to bring to the table is "I'm under duress but I'll comply!", just stay out of the fight completely. It's just useless virtue signaling in a time where serious action is the only remedy.
Talking specifically about this video, it's more a demonstration that highlights that these nurses are not following their code of ethics than anything else.
Talking about your weird standard of consent, again, by your logic, a threat of imprisonment or death would also constitute consent. It doesn't.
Freedom requires sacrifice. Giving into a threat even though you really super duper don't want to is compliance. You want what they offer more than you want bodily autonomy.
Just like the actors and actresses who sucked dick to get a role.
Whether it's "compliance" or not doesn't make it "consent" in any real usage of the word.
Consenting under duress is not consent at all.
No, I don't want what they offer, I don't want them to take away what I already have. The government didn't "offer" me my freedom. But they are able to take it away.
Consent occurs when one person voluntarily agrees to the proposal or desires of another. If you take an experimental gene therapy product to keep your job, that is absolutely voluntary. That is their offer; consent to maintain your current lifestyle or be inconvenienced and find a new job. You are choosing comfort and safety over maintaining your own bodily autonomy. If your boss said suck my dick or you're fired; I hope you make it clear you are under duress while you fondle his balls.
You don't have or deserve any freedoms you aren't willing to make a sacrifice for. I get it, it's an extremely difficult choice. But if all you are going to bring to the table is "I'm under duress but I'll comply!", just stay out of the fight completely. It's just useless virtue signaling in a time where serious action is the only remedy.
Talking specifically about this video, it's more a demonstration that highlights that these nurses are not following their code of ethics than anything else.
Talking about your weird standard of consent, again, by your logic, a threat of imprisonment or death would also constitute consent. It doesn't.