Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
Depending on what’s said some of those points are completely valid. I don’t have enough fingers to count the posts on social media making terrible blanket statements based on correlation or deriving ridiculous conclusions from a study.
I love how obsequious droolers believe that an argument from authority somehow validates their position. It elucidates clearly their perpetual need as mindless consumers to wait to be told what to think instead of investigating any particular topic themselves using the greatest innovation in human history, which gives them access to the entire world's accumulated knowledge.
This not only demonstrates how obdurately stupid and lazy they are, but how they specifically seek out confirmation bias from sources they know are bias towards the views they wish to believe — places that very frequently conflate opinion with "fact." A group of vacuous morons driven by their myopic ideological zealotry projecting their cult-like behavior onto others because they're too dumb to realize the media manufactured hate fantasies that they've been inculcated with by their consumerism habits only exist inside their own heads and their echo chambers.
This is precisely why so many people juxtapose their bizarre deleterious behavior to a new type of self-worshiping theology or a cult — yet, for those who drank the kool-aid, they completely lack the self-awareness to realize it. As if at any point in history the people who were brainwashed were aware of their situation.
They can't point the finger and say, "No, you're the brainwashed one!" either. It's their side that completely controls every single institution of consumer culture. They have zero basis for such a ridiculous rebuttal, other than parroting nonsense media pushed into their enervated brains — which, coincidentally, only further illustrates the point.
I love how obsequious droolers believe that an argument from authority somehow validates their position.
I love that word "obsequious", but it's a little like "obdurate" and "obstinate", insofar that I don't get to use them often enough. But in the case of Lefties/SJWs, it's nice that these words are finding a fitting home for the likes of them.
Ah yes fact checking websites. The same ones that have plagiarist founders and call while people terrorists (while also listing terrorist like actions for a black person and saying “terrorist isn’t actually defined”).
Those sites have pure facts, pure morals, and don’t push an agenda.
On another note I’m sick of lefties acting like everything is misinformation except CNN, The Guardian, The Verge, and whatever else is seen as gospel. Those sites have shown insane bias and blatant lies. Don’t get me wrong I don’t trust any article at face value, and from what I’ve seen most people on this site don’t either.
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
Depending on what’s said some of those points are completely valid. I don’t have enough fingers to count the posts on social media making terrible blanket statements based on correlation or deriving ridiculous conclusions from a study.
I love how obsequious droolers believe that an argument from authority somehow validates their position. It elucidates clearly their perpetual need as mindless consumers to wait to be told what to think instead of investigating any particular topic themselves using the greatest innovation in human history, which gives them access to the entire world's accumulated knowledge.
This not only demonstrates how obdurately stupid and lazy they are, but how they specifically seek out confirmation bias from sources they know are bias towards the views they wish to believe — places that very frequently conflate opinion with "fact." A group of vacuous morons driven by their myopic ideological zealotry projecting their cult-like behavior onto others because they're too dumb to realize the media manufactured hate fantasies that they've been inculcated with by their consumerism habits only exist inside their own heads and their echo chambers.
This is precisely why so many people juxtapose their bizarre deleterious behavior to a new type of self-worshiping theology or a cult — yet, for those who drank the kool-aid, they completely lack the self-awareness to realize it. As if at any point in history the people who were brainwashed were aware of their situation.
They can't point the finger and say, "No, you're the brainwashed one!" either. It's their side that completely controls every single institution of consumer culture. They have zero basis for such a ridiculous rebuttal, other than parroting nonsense media pushed into their enervated brains — which, coincidentally, only further illustrates the point.
I love that word "obsequious", but it's a little like "obdurate" and "obstinate", insofar that I don't get to use them often enough. But in the case of Lefties/SJWs, it's nice that these words are finding a fitting home for the likes of them.
Ah yes fact checking websites. The same ones that have plagiarist founders and call while people terrorists (while also listing terrorist like actions for a black person and saying “terrorist isn’t actually defined”).
Those sites have pure facts, pure morals, and don’t push an agenda.
On another note I’m sick of lefties acting like everything is misinformation except CNN, The Guardian, The Verge, and whatever else is seen as gospel. Those sites have shown insane bias and blatant lies. Don’t get me wrong I don’t trust any article at face value, and from what I’ve seen most people on this site don’t either.
Checks out.