We dont run the media.
We dont run the government.
We dont run social media.
We dont run the banks.
The gloablist left does.
When they use political violence, they get away with it because they run society. When we so much as smirk in the wrong direction, we get treated as terrorists and they get a new reason to expand their power. They have the hearts and minds and power. We dont resort to violence for any moral reason, but because IT WONT FUCKING WORK AND WILL LITERALLY ONLY MAKE THINGS WORSE.
What the right should be doing, is organizing. Prepping. Learning. Talking with normies and opening minds. Its the people vs the full force of the establishment and we dont win this without an organized, intelligent, moral and overwhelmingly large mass of people first.
Who is going to take kia2.win down? This isn't reddit where the admins openly apply the rules only against those who are ideologically opposed to them. Are there even any sitewide rules that aren't "Don't break US law?"
There's win admins. There's hosters. There's domain registrars.
The Daily Stormer was taken down for much less than inciting violence, merely saying that he doesn't care about that woman in Charlottesville dying.
So we should self censor and reject discussion of practical problems simply because someone will decide to censor us in the future? They're going to do that anyway if something drastic doesn't change.
Being careful and not getting taken down is better than being taken down - just to allow completely pointless nonsense that isn't going to lead anywhere.
That depends on what the tradeoff is. Especially since that's (probably) going to happen eventually anyway whether or not we're permitted "engage in speech that promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence." Fuck, that even covers cases where that violence is permitted/endorsed by the government.
Could you provide some examples of what constitutes this? I can't really tell what he's posted that's been removed.
So if someone here were to nut up and assassinate a politician or big tech CEO or something it'd be ok to advocate violence then?
Don't be lazy and use someone else's site.
Don't be cheap and use someone else's server.
Okay DNS is kinda foundational but strictly speaking it isn't an absolute necessity.
If you put me to the task of building a system that's beyond the reach of SJWs to take down, it would probably be built on a combination of torrent and blockchain technology.
You could build a blockchain based BBS, as long as you could acclimate people to the problem of eventual consistency.
You would essentially be going back to the old days of usenet news, except based on torrent instead of UUCP.
We should definitely give up domains so worthless spergs can incite violence.
And it will also be visited by exactly no one.
I think you're grossly underestimating the appeal of what would essentially be a headless version of discord.