We dont run the media.
We dont run the government.
We dont run social media.
We dont run the banks.
The gloablist left does.
When they use political violence, they get away with it because they run society. When we so much as smirk in the wrong direction, we get treated as terrorists and they get a new reason to expand their power. They have the hearts and minds and power. We dont resort to violence for any moral reason, but because IT WONT FUCKING WORK AND WILL LITERALLY ONLY MAKE THINGS WORSE.
What the right should be doing, is organizing. Prepping. Learning. Talking with normies and opening minds. Its the people vs the full force of the establishment and we dont win this without an organized, intelligent, moral and overwhelmingly large mass of people first.
Being careful and not getting taken down is better than being taken down - just to allow completely pointless nonsense that isn't going to lead anywhere.
That depends on what the tradeoff is. Especially since that's (probably) going to happen eventually anyway whether or not we're permitted "engage in speech that promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence." Fuck, that even covers cases where that violence is permitted/endorsed by the government.
Could you provide some examples of what constitutes this? I can't really tell what he's posted that's been removed.
So if someone here were to nut up and assassinate a politician or big tech CEO or something it'd be ok to advocate violence then?
Just moments ago, you were saying that it's impossible, and now it's inevitable?
Obviously, that isn't going to create problems.
Advocating for violence in response to present politics.
No, there's plenty more where that came from. That's the very definition of pointlessness.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed: Rule 2 and Rule 1.
Who is going to take kia2.win down? This isn't reddit where the admins openly apply the rules only against those who are ideologically opposed to them.
I'm not replying to the rest, for obvious reasons.