J&J is a traditional vaccine, not mRNA therapy. However traditional coronavirus vaccines are noted for having worse side effects and were completely avoided before Covid because the harm outweighs the benefits. The problem here is every vaccine before now was planned on needing boosters and do not need continuous boosters. What we are referring to as “boosters” now are unheard of in any medical literature. It’s booster as we go instead of spacing out shots intentionally to guarantee efficacy.
Hold on, it is NOT a traditional vaccine. They ADVERTISE it as a 'traditional' vaccine because of only one shot, but it is actually far more dangerous then the others, which is why it is banned in many states and countries around the world.
It uses a different, also untested technology that differs from mRNA but is actually even less researched.
I got the vaccine (will not be booooosting though) and don't regret it per se, but among other things their refusal to even acknowledge that the spikes are intrinsically dangerous is why I won't argue in favor of the vaccine.
Multiple vaccines require a “booster” shot to guarantee efficacy, these are known beforehand and are used because only a certain percentage of people properly develop memory cells from the initial vaccine dose. What we are seeing now is the continuous “topping up” of vaccination despite no evidence it works, and as we see in Israel they have already begun pushing a fourth shot because the booster is ineffective. They are calling this “topping up” a booster when it is anything but.
Hardly any traditional childhood vaccines require boosters though.
Most vaccines carry lifelong protection as soon as the original primary/induction series is complete.
The only exceptions I can think of are influenza, tetanus and the oral ETEC travelers' diarrhea vaccine.
Influenza isn't really a traditional vaccine since it only offers partial and temporary protection.
Tetanus is boosted every ten years. Some research argues even this is unnecessary and you could probably get away with every 30.
The Dukoral ETEC oral travelers' diarrhea vaccine isn't a traditional vaccine either since it's swallowed and was originally designed to protect against cholera. Now it's marketed to westerners to reduce the risk of TD but with "shitty" efficiency of less than 25% and only lasting 3 months to 2 years.
J&J is a traditional vaccine, not mRNA therapy. However traditional coronavirus vaccines are noted for having worse side effects and were completely avoided before Covid because the harm outweighs the benefits. The problem here is every vaccine before now was planned on needing boosters and do not need continuous boosters. What we are referring to as “boosters” now are unheard of in any medical literature. It’s booster as we go instead of spacing out shots intentionally to guarantee efficacy.
Hold on, it is NOT a traditional vaccine. They ADVERTISE it as a 'traditional' vaccine because of only one shot, but it is actually far more dangerous then the others, which is why it is banned in many states and countries around the world.
It uses a different, also untested technology that differs from mRNA but is actually even less researched.
Sorry, traditional coronavirus vaccine. It is the same methodology as the failed MERS and SARS coronavirus vaccines.
It is an mRNA vaccine. The difference is the mRNA is delivered in an adenovirus rather than a nanolipid.
I got the vaccine (will not be booooosting though) and don't regret it per se, but among other things their refusal to even acknowledge that the spikes are intrinsically dangerous is why I won't argue in favor of the vaccine.
Huh?
Multiple vaccines require a “booster” shot to guarantee efficacy, these are known beforehand and are used because only a certain percentage of people properly develop memory cells from the initial vaccine dose. What we are seeing now is the continuous “topping up” of vaccination despite no evidence it works, and as we see in Israel they have already begun pushing a fourth shot because the booster is ineffective. They are calling this “topping up” a booster when it is anything but.
Hardly any traditional childhood vaccines require boosters though.
Most vaccines carry lifelong protection as soon as the original primary/induction series is complete.
The only exceptions I can think of are influenza, tetanus and the oral ETEC travelers' diarrhea vaccine.
Influenza isn't really a traditional vaccine since it only offers partial and temporary protection.
Tetanus is boosted every ten years. Some research argues even this is unnecessary and you could probably get away with every 30.
The Dukoral ETEC oral travelers' diarrhea vaccine isn't a traditional vaccine either since it's swallowed and was originally designed to protect against cholera. Now it's marketed to westerners to reduce the risk of TD but with "shitty" efficiency of less than 25% and only lasting 3 months to 2 years.
My nigga.
Someone here actually has some medical experience and understand just how fucky it is that these boosters are being pushed in the first place.
Got it. Thanks.