Thomas Sowell pointed out something very interesting in "Immigration and Cultures" about both Overseas Chinese, Immigrant Jews, and some Indian Africans. He didn't say it explicitly, but the one thing they had in common that gave rise to resentment politics in the domestic populations was paternalism.

These are immigrant groups that would be highly industrious, highly literate, have an extreme work ethic (which even involved young children working in family shops); and that would benefit the family's wealth quite quickly; and pull the 1st generation out of poverty after a few decades (regardless of structural barriers), and put the 2nd generation in a privileged position.

The Domestic populations would see this success with shock and resentment, which starts creating resentment politics. Then these immigrant groups do the absolute worst possible thing, while thinking they are doing the right thing: take a paternalistic stance in government to "uplift" the poor domestic groups that they surpassed.

It goes completely sideways 100% of the time. As soon as someone in the government starts treating the people as a family, they start treating them as children, pushing heavy handed authoritarianism, a sense of supremacy, enormous ethnic tensions (which are then exploited by resentment mongers on all sides). The wealthy immigrant group starts off feeling a sense of guilt for being successful, then authority for being the ones who succeeded, then resentment since their advances (which they "know are for the greater good") are rebuffed. The Domestic population starts with a sense of shock that the immigrant group accomplished social mobility in 1 generation that they hadn't achieved in 4. This fuels a sense of shame that they might have done something wrong, then it fuels a sense of resentment that they couldn't have done anything wrong and must have had something taken from them.

The paternalism of the immigrant group is supposed to reduce resentment by creating an exchange of human capital. But instead, it fosters it! The policies blow back on themselves, and usually with significant violence. The introduction of paternalism creates resentment among the domestics, the rebuke of the paternalism fosters resentment among the immigrants who then push back with punitive or arrogant measures, this causes more resentment among the domestic population which causes reprisals. Then the immigrants are stunned by what they see as attacks for trying to do good, and then begin to regard the domestics as savages needing to be suppressed for their own good. This only fuels more resentment and hostility until the whole country explodes into an orgy of violence.

If you were paying attention, you'll have noticed that Communists can push their narrative in either case, to either group; and can even claim that Communism would finish the whole crisis (while they also profit off of exploiting the balkanization of the country). The Overseas Chinese were a good example of this because in Indonesia, China objected to the ethnic cleansing of foreign nationals, but said absolutely nothing when Cambodia did the same.

How women fit into this is how women make political choices.

A startling statistic I saw about women was that marriage was the best predictor of political leaning. The pattern was this:

• Never married: Strong Democrat
• Married once: Strong Republican
• Divorced: Strong Democrat
• Married Twice: Lean Republican
• Divorced Twice: Lean Democrat
• Married Thrice: Lean Republican
• Divorced Thrice: Lean Democrat
• Married 4 times: Lean Republican

That's regardless of age too.

Women are not simply changing all of their political opinions just because they are married. However, what I believe is happening is that women are bouncing between using the state as their patriarch, rather than their husband as a patriarch.

Women are bouncing back and forth between a husband figure that can provide and protect them and their family; and a state which allegedly does the same. If she's in a weak marriage with a weak man, or if she's unwed or divorced, she's using the state as the provider and protector. On the other hand, if she's married with a strong man, or in a strong marriage, the state is now interfering in her family building, and keeping the man from protecting and providing.

Authoritarianism creates a hypergamy. Men are competing with the state for women.

This is also one of the reasons I believe I've heard of so many stories of women leaving the woke cult because they got boyfriends, and why there's a slew of Leftist women complaining that they have an uncontrollable attraction to Trump supporters. I believe this is also why we are seeing such a huge gender divide between men and women.

What these two seemingly different threads mean is that paternalism is a way for the government to fulfill women's needs, making women dependent upon the government as the patriarch. Simultaneously, any women in government would take either a paternalistic, or a materialistic approach towards governing the society. Which would then cause extraordinary resentment among the general population as they feel like they are being treated like children... because they are being mothered by the state. And, like a 15 year old sleeping in a crib and wearing a diaper, this will be abusive, traumatizing, and result in violent backlash.

This also answers your other two parts about Whites doing this. Guilt of success has been peddled by Communists for a very long time, but this guilt isn't any different than the guilt felt by the Indians, Chinese, or Jews who resorted to paternalist governments to "uplift" people. The WASPs in America have been targeted by Leftists for a while to teach them guilt as a way to infiltrate both sides of the conflict and to benefit from the balkanization.

They know what they are doing: white paternalism stokes black resentment, black resentment stokes white resentment, paternalism of the state promotes dependency to it, teach women to resent men and destroy the family. The bastards are doing this on purpose because America is one of the harder countries to kill.