BBC journalists almost escape the official narrative. Now add side effects from the 3rd jab + 4th jab...
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Notice how they've switched to "per capita" instead of simply presenting the raw numbers as they did with Covid cases and deaths?
Why do people think that would be?
It's likely because not that many children have really been vaccinated yet, so they sample size of the data is relatively small overall.
If UK's reporting system is anything like the VAERS system in the US, then those statistics will be severely inaccurate by a massive amount.
In the US, a 2010 Harvard Study commissioned by the US Government showed that only 1% of Adverse Reactions ever get reported to the VAERS system. This study has been corroborated by other sources as well, such as the Journal of the American Medical Association which place it anywhere from 0.8% to 2%.
People can do the math on what that means, right? It also aligns perfectly with what whistleblowers — of which there are many, the most famous being the Veritas one — have been saying for quite a while.
Tell me that the vaccine doesn't present a much larger risk when they include this at the bottom of the page:
Not only will the vaccine kill many more children than 25, they even admit that only 6 of those deaths had no pre-existing conditions.
Let that sink in for a minute.
When you add on top of that the myocarditis, which will cause irreparable damage to these children's developing hearts and crippling adverse reactions, which will also cause a lifetime of misery, it paints a dark picture. It will end up leading to an early death in both cases. That's not even including the inevitable allergic reactions causing anaphylaxis either.
I'll be as succinct as possible: These people are pure evil. Plain and simple.
I can't help but find shit like this completely heartbreaking. I don't care how much of a misanthropic nihilist a person may be, kids don't deserve this shit. They shouldn't be used as tools for politics and authoritarian agendas.
I bet those 6 were obese as fuck and they just aren't counting obesity as a preexisting condition.
Or break it down by age and gender, and watch those risk numbers go up a ton for younger boys, who account for almost all the cases of myocarditis, and the benefit drop for younger children as well.
And I wonder how many hospital admissions would be prevented by not spending the last year and a half telling parents that the wuhan virus is so dangerous it's worth shutting down society over. "Defunding the BBC: Cut hospital admissions for covid by 90%"
shut down this disinformation!
Even that flies in the face of the narrative, because these numbers are absolutely shocking. Honestly, they are far, far worse than even I imagined.
Give a million people one jab and you prevent just TWO intensive care cases? ICU survival rate is 52% so if we vaccinate 70 million (approximate UK population) people we have saved... THREE LIVES!
87 hospital admissions prevented. So... Across 70 million people... 609 admissions prevented? Does 'prevented' include or exclude the myocarditis cases?
Second dose... These benefits are so miniscule they could be statistical noise.
12-34 cases of myocarditis is a SIZEABLE chunk of the prevented hospital admissions from one dose, but seems almost certain to result in more than 1 death.
My conclusion on the vaccine, based on these OFFICIAL NUMBERS from the UK government, published by the state broadcaster... Is that one dose of the vaccine offers a small benefit that does not really seem worth the financial cost to the taxpayer, and that two doses is very likely making things actively worse.
A third dose is pure madness, and any government pushing it deserves stringing up like Mussolini.
Those numbers are for children. Although it really does make a case for not vaccinating children (there was never a good case for vaccinating children).
Well in that case;
A third dose is pure madness, and any government pushing it on children deserves stringing up like Mussolini.
with myocarditis having 50% mortality over 5 years, this chart means they're creating, at the very best, 3 walking dead to prevent 2 ICU admissions (not even deaths).
They've become so twisted in their human worship, it's become "noble" to accept a million (human) injuries if (they think) it saves one (human) life.
Their selfishness is probably worse :
Reality - they are a morbidly obese lesbian BBC journalist - so they HAVE some risks from covid (because they can't put down the fucking twinkies)
In their mind - because of covid - they are destined to die alone without a child and are taking revenge on young and healthy men with ZERO risk from covid.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-57888429
hey niggar, there arent any preventions if 30 people need to be hospitalized you fucking retard faggot