Hahaha, you've made hundreds of hours of videos parroting and ranting about other people's opinions, quit kidding yourself you don't care, you just can't respond to them normally because you're a crazy sperg.

You actively invite opinions constantly with your whining about stormfags everywhere, whether you're too socially inept to realize it or not. Just look at this shit, every reasonable anti jewish-conspiracy comment is fine and positive, even the imp managed to make more coherent arguments that it's secretly the womenz not the jooz. Then there's you yapping like an autistic chihuahua at the bottom of every thread being so obnoxious that normal people end up thinking you're about as downvoteworthy as the stormies. People as a whole are dumb and emotional, they're prone to letting the dumbest person holding an opinion shape their prejudices of everyone holding that opinion by association, and you're the gold standard of that in this case. You'd literally do more harm to their cause if you just shut up and said nothing than you do with your spastic rants.

I mean look at the link you were spamming everywhere, an article that goes: "Akshually, <3% of Soviet officials in a single county in the ass end of nowhere Romania were Jewish. What about the actual Bolsheviks and the remaining 99.99% of the Soviet Union you might ask? Well I don't count numbers of jews in places, it's actually impossible because strict ethnicity is imaginary." Who the fuck looks at that and thinks "that's so compelling I'm going to spam it everywhere"? And not "that's logic so badly twisted and inconsistent it's practically fucking incriminating". The worst thing is that's possibly a spin on the book by the journalist writing the article, he just says the author quotes the man who reported that number, not that the author cherry picked and supported the quoted number himself, in direct contradiction of his excuse for not revealing a population-wide count himself. So maybe you could have even used the same primary source in your argument, if you just hadn't chosen the shit tier journalist to make the argument for you, who shilled so hard he tripped over his own feet and broke the back of the argument with a terribly mangled out-of-context quote. If that's the best someone has to offer you have to start to presume they have nothing concrete at all, your arguments are so uncompelling they're almost compelling in the opposite direction. You're anti-compelling, that's why I said you post more anti-semitic shit than the stormies themselves.

I don't particularly want the stormfront comments either, but I at least understand enough to know that screeching like a petulant child and displaying a complete lack of insight or integrity is a terrible way to make a sympathetic case for that and will do far more harm than good.