Chile artists actually had to grow up. Those that draw bean mouths never had to work for money or moved away from their parent’s (financially or otherwise.) Plus, Disney is the highest employer of artists in the US and they exclusively hire for California School of Fine Arts.
Also, they don’t have to deal with US commi-media like US Twitter.
Also, they don’t have to deal with US commi-media like US Twitter.
This despite being full of commies themselves.
Their cultures are less resistant to communism than the American culture is, so the communists that are there don't go fucking insane trying to destroy their culture.
Their leftists don't concern themselves with making women look like men, or men look like women, or trying to pretend the perfect woman isn't a curvy-athletic-with-big-tits-and-a-toned-ass. They don't need to, because they can get their people into socialism without having to destroy them first.
Americans - and Anglophone nations in general - have to first be culturally obliterated before they will accept communism.
There is a simpler reason that they use CalArts for most of the major, mainstream shows: Its cheap and can be cranked out extremely quickly. Because Disney has declared that their strategy for keeping people watching their stuff is quantity over quality, so that necessarily means cheap, rapidly produced cartoons....that then get no one to watch it, or get invested enough to watch it long term. Which is why Disney is now running into money trouble and may have to start screwing with Disney+ to keep it from going bankrupt.
CalArts style is designed around turning out cheap mass produced stuff with software. Check out Toon Boom software for example. That's not to say something like what's where couldn't and isn't created with software, but every time you see an extra detail someone spent time on that. Why would a Disney or a Cartoon Network or whatever waste time on that? Make some cheap crap, sell some toys to match, get some YouTubers to talk good about it and watch the money roll in.
I used to laugh at anime and still particularly don't care for some of the more egregious stereotypes in the art style. Still, how they use things as simple as background scenes that are actually artistic, depth, some facial expressions, etc. even on the most modern and mainstream stuff is just way more appealing to me than anything that comes out of the USA.
I am just going to mention that the real name for the "cal-arts" style is thin line, and yes it's stupid crap that was designed to quickly push garbage out
The reason it became popular with the regressive left is due to it's good support for character designs that comply with their extremist ideologies and concepts like intersectionalism, objectification theory, fat acceptance bullshit, etc.
As for diives, I am VERY familiar with his artwork.
Chile artists actually had to grow up. Those that draw bean mouths never had to work for money or moved away from their parent’s (financially or otherwise.) Plus, Disney is the highest employer of artists in the US and they exclusively hire for California School of Fine Arts.
Also, they don’t have to deal with US commi-media like US Twitter.
This despite being full of commies themselves. Their cultures are less resistant to communism than the American culture is, so the communists that are there don't go fucking insane trying to destroy their culture.
Their leftists don't concern themselves with making women look like men, or men look like women, or trying to pretend the perfect woman isn't a curvy-athletic-with-big-tits-and-a-toned-ass. They don't need to, because they can get their people into socialism without having to destroy them first.
Americans - and Anglophone nations in general - have to first be culturally obliterated before they will accept communism.
Add the Eastern European nations. They tend to hate communism so they will be eradicated before conversion.
There is a simpler reason that they use CalArts for most of the major, mainstream shows: Its cheap and can be cranked out extremely quickly. Because Disney has declared that their strategy for keeping people watching their stuff is quantity over quality, so that necessarily means cheap, rapidly produced cartoons....that then get no one to watch it, or get invested enough to watch it long term. Which is why Disney is now running into money trouble and may have to start screwing with Disney+ to keep it from going bankrupt.
CalArts style is designed around turning out cheap mass produced stuff with software. Check out Toon Boom software for example. That's not to say something like what's where couldn't and isn't created with software, but every time you see an extra detail someone spent time on that. Why would a Disney or a Cartoon Network or whatever waste time on that? Make some cheap crap, sell some toys to match, get some YouTubers to talk good about it and watch the money roll in.
I used to laugh at anime and still particularly don't care for some of the more egregious stereotypes in the art style. Still, how they use things as simple as background scenes that are actually artistic, depth, some facial expressions, etc. even on the most modern and mainstream stuff is just way more appealing to me than anything that comes out of the USA.
I'm Chilean and I didn't know about this! I will check this guy out.
Interesting style, looks like it’s got just a hint of various familiar styles and shows, but still seems 100% it’s own thing.
What is Calarts? Is that who we should blame for modern day crappy animation?
CalArts is the short version for referring to California Institute of Art, who are the biggest animation studio in the US. And yes, they are responsible for it. Gaze upon their works and despair, ye who value fine art and animation!
Also, we cant figure out why we are getting our asses kicked by anime.- US Animation
Thanks. Now I understand
I am just going to mention that the real name for the "cal-arts" style is thin line, and yes it's stupid crap that was designed to quickly push garbage out
The reason it became popular with the regressive left is due to it's good support for character designs that comply with their extremist ideologies and concepts like intersectionalism, objectification theory, fat acceptance bullshit, etc.
As for diives, I am VERY familiar with his artwork.