So here is the source. According to this document, seven people died after receiving the vaccine, but the connection with the vaccine is by no means certain.
Actually, I have seen a CDC PDF with breakdowns like that one. The numbers claimed by the CDC are about 1/10 of what your image shows. 170 out of 1 million is about a 0.017% chance of getting myocarditis, which I'm not at all sure is worth cutting the risk of death/hospitalization for the coronavirus.
But the numbers of death and injury are quit disappointing innit? Apparently, women can't even properly create a vaccine intended to kill men. They really should get some men to do that for them.
The most bizarre and absurd answer is usually the right answer, so let me guess... to kill you?
What are your predictions for the booster? I'll even ignore the fact that you earlier predicted that the vaccine wouldn't kill people because "it would only kill people who trust THEM".
I didn't expect they'd get away with forcing it. I thought people would resist more and that the plan would be to release an engineered weapon in 2022.
But you also bet that wahmen would be exempted from taking the AstraZeneca vaccine. That suggests that you did think they could get away with forcing it. Also, it would be quite uncharacteristic for you to believe that they wouldn't succeed, as you were also panicking about that 'male curfew' of yours, which had a 0% chance.
A constant slow rise in male vaccine injuries and fatalities relative to having only 2 jabs.
Well duh. Anything more specific than "SOME PEOPLE WILL SUFFER SIDE-EFFECTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!", which even a retarded monkey could predict? Since you're claiming that the intent of the boosters is to murder people, shouldn't it be worth their while? How many?
So here is the source. According to this document, seven people died after receiving the vaccine, but the connection with the vaccine is by no means certain.
Actually, I have seen a CDC PDF with breakdowns like that one. The numbers claimed by the CDC are about 1/10 of what your image shows. 170 out of 1 million is about a 0.017% chance of getting myocarditis, which I'm not at all sure is worth cutting the risk of death/hospitalization for the coronavirus.
But the numbers of death and injury are quit disappointing innit? Apparently, women can't even properly create a vaccine intended to kill men. They really should get some men to do that for them.
Whats the rate for under 40s prevacc?
The most bizarre and absurd answer is usually the right answer, so let me guess... to kill you?
What are your predictions for the booster? I'll even ignore the fact that you earlier predicted that the vaccine wouldn't kill people because "it would only kill people who trust THEM".
But you also bet that wahmen would be exempted from taking the AstraZeneca vaccine. That suggests that you did think they could get away with forcing it. Also, it would be quite uncharacteristic for you to believe that they wouldn't succeed, as you were also panicking about that 'male curfew' of yours, which had a 0% chance.
Well duh. Anything more specific than "SOME PEOPLE WILL SUFFER SIDE-EFFECTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!", which even a retarded monkey could predict? Since you're claiming that the intent of the boosters is to murder people, shouldn't it be worth their while? How many?