On Monday I saw an article that indicated the number of NY healthcare workers were going to get fired for not submitting to the vax mandate. Today it's "dozens".
I just saw United, which I think has 100k employees fired only 600. That's 0.6%.
Looks like a small percentage, 1% or less are actually willing to get fired over it. I was hoping for at least 5%, but even that is looking like a pipe dream.
It could be the media is lying about how many are actually being fired, but how long can the data actually be hidden for?
Does anyone else have evidence of more?
The media is always lying.
It is clear that none of the vaccinated numbers are honest.
Biden constantly says that only 25 percent of the population is not vaccinated but I don't buy that at all. They wouldn't be ramping up the pressure this much if they already controlled a full 75 percent already.
My guess is the real numbers are probably 50-60 percent vaxxed at most.
There are definitely more people that have chosen to avoid the poison vax than we are shown.
They want to make it look like those who have avoided the vax are a small minority and will be screwed. Classic glowie controlled media psyop.
I hope you are right, but people are so fucking weak. A coworker of mine who is generally based got it a few weeks ago so he could "travel easier".
I've started to pick up on the existence of a "Dissident, Inc". We of course know about ConInc, but there's also an equivalent within the Dissident Right/Reactionaries/Frogs/whatever you want to call that section of the internet. You could also call them "Regime Dissidents" in honor of Lew Rockwell's similar idea of the "Regime Libertarian".
These are the people who talk the talk and write the articles about the need to "organize" against the Regime (but give no concrete or actionable ideas on where to start) and some future time when people are going to "wake up" (but over what they never say). But everything they do conforms to the regime: they work for the regime with no apparent plan to separate themselves from it, change it, damage it from within, or build parallel institutions to it; and they conform to its rules and advocate others do the same in order to be better able to fight some future battle that never seems to come.
When my 70+ year old Facebook Conservative next door neighbor puts up more of a fight over vaccine mandates than some of these online "dissidents", something is wrong.
I was thinking of a lot of the people on this list. And specifically this comment from Greg Johnson.
Because at some point in the indeterminate future we're somehow going to "overthrow the system", but before we do we need to take our injections so we can...fly to conferences I guess. Because there's always a "more important battle" (what?) to fight.
There are two heuristics I'm starting to use to determine if someone is not "Dissident Inc":
I don't have to agree with those proposals or red lines because we're all trying to figure this shit out as we go and where we're going keeps changing, but the existence of those two things leads me to believe someone is acting in good-faith.
Watchlist examples:
Examples of Specific, Actionable proposals that don't get you on a watchlist:
Who's on your watchlist then if you don't mind me asking? Either for news or commentary
IIRC, the 75% vaxed number is if you include everyone who has had at least one dose, while the fully vaxed is indeed around 50%. And very little has made it budge over that amount, especially as a significant chunk of the country in terms of area (read: pretty much everywhere outside of major cities) is well and truly done and back at as close to normal as they can currently get with all of the shortages in effect.