Oh no, you mean the exact same thing they have done for every hostile foreign power since inception? Holodomor denial is still strong in American communists today.
Arguably, the expulsions of Germans from Eastern Europe should count as genocide (considering that over a million died), but not the mere loss of territory after losing wars. If territorial loss is genocide, then the word has lost its meaning.
Then Jews got genocided thrice in the 20th century.
Nazi germany
The loss of Jordan from the Belfour accord
Then the loss of Sinai.
But don't let that destroy the narrative, after all, wasn't the Palestinians supposed to be in Jordan? Because that is what it was made for. For the Palestinians. Not only that, who attacked first in 1948? Almost all Arab countries, when JEws were celebrating, they attacked.
While I have no doubt at all about the perfidy of the New York Times, which earlier that decade won a Pulitzer prize for denying the Holodomor, the front page does not suggest that they were in any way justifying German actions.
That said, if even the newspaper of Walter Duranty would not stoop to transcribing the lies told by governments, how much worse is it today for its non-stop deluge of lies and nonsense?
I’m really not a fan of painting the Confederate/Confederacy as some “universal evil equivalent to Nazi Germany”, personally...
But yes, I agree that they are shitty hypocrites. I just... Don’t agree with the bizarre 21st century “moralizing” against the Confederacy, in your country...
Oh no, you mean the exact same thing they have done for every hostile foreign power since inception? Holodomor denial is still strong in American communists today.
Holodomor, Holocaust, Landlord massacre... Denying genocide is a VERY socialist thing.
What genocide? Their numbers increased exponentially.
Seems you are triggered over this, want to try again?
I don't know about their population, but you can easily compare the amount of land Palestine had when Israel was founded to now.
Losing land because of wars you start and then lose is not genocide. If it were, then Germany suffered genocide in the 20th century.
They kinda did (they also started it and set the rules).
Arguably, the expulsions of Germans from Eastern Europe should count as genocide (considering that over a million died), but not the mere loss of territory after losing wars. If territorial loss is genocide, then the word has lost its meaning.
Then Jews got genocided thrice in the 20th century.
Nazi germany
The loss of Jordan from the Belfour accord
Then the loss of Sinai.
But don't let that destroy the narrative, after all, wasn't the Palestinians supposed to be in Jordan? Because that is what it was made for. For the Palestinians. Not only that, who attacked first in 1948? Almost all Arab countries, when JEws were celebrating, they attacked.
Who took Jerusalem from the UN in 1948? JORDAN.
Did the number of Jews increase between 1942 and 1945?
Then prove the genocide occurred.
What makes this funniest is that your username is literally 'reeeee'.
I note that you could not answer even one though. Bravo.
Cope.
While I have no doubt at all about the perfidy of the New York Times, which earlier that decade won a Pulitzer prize for denying the Holodomor, the front page does not suggest that they were in any way justifying German actions.
That said, if even the newspaper of Walter Duranty would not stoop to transcribing the lies told by governments, how much worse is it today for its non-stop deluge of lies and nonsense?
I’m really not a fan of painting the Confederate/Confederacy as some “universal evil equivalent to Nazi Germany”, personally...
But yes, I agree that they are shitty hypocrites. I just... Don’t agree with the bizarre 21st century “moralizing” against the Confederacy, in your country...