I've had this stewing in my head for awhile now, so please bear with me.
It's a pretty common thing around here for us to look at the cardiac and potential reproductive damage the jab does, and to declare it as the weapon of the Powers That Be. That one way or another, it's out to reduce the population and act as a tool for the establishment of a more totalitarian world.
And on the whole, I agree that the thing is damn suspicious. The sheer extent of the pushing of it, the authoritarian excesses in trying to get shots in arms. I know that the pharma giants are getting fatter from it, and normally I'd be willing to suppose that's the entire reason behind all of it, but it's gotten so bad, so thoroughly that the whole thing stinks to high heaven, worse than just mere greed should.
But there's one thing bothering me about the model of the jab as a weapon.
It's targeting the wrong people, from the perspective of The Powers That Be.
----Why would you design a weapon to mostly kill your allies?----
If the jab is intended to cause some sort of population reduction on its own, then think of the people it's due to cull right now. It's targeting the sheep. The followers. The Maskeraders. The Branch Covidians. The people getting the jab are the ones who have swallowed the narrative of The Authorities.
Why would The Proverbial They want to kill that crowd, and leave behind the anti-vaxxers? They would be left with a world containing only their enemies.
I can all but hear Impossible1 warming up the old 'we must reduce the male population to 10%,' but think of which 10% Women are selecting for here. They're selecting against the soy-faced beta males that Women loathe even as they use them to dust, and that's understandable, yes... And they are selecting Chads, or at least, it's pleasant to think that our side has an abundance of Chads. But we're also disproportionately full of Sigma Males who will have no interest in putting up with this shit. Not exactly pleasant, dutiful breeder stud material. Especially if the Great Dying/Chemical Castration begins becoming undeniable and we start actively going out for revenge.
And let's suppose that The Proverbial They is in fact (((Them))).
Why the flying fuck is Israel the most heavily jabbed area in the world, and seemingly going the route of the vaxmax greentext, if the rumblings about booster shots are to be believed?
It doesn't quite fit. No matter who The Authorities are, it doesn't really make sense for them to be targeting their most indoctrinated followers, and selecting their most vicious enemies for survival.
No, I think if it's a weapon, it has to be a weapon against the people not receiving the jab.
----Marek's Disease, Or: How to turn the coof into an actual pandemic----
I think it's fair to say that it is known around here that the jab does next to nothing to actually stop the spread of covid, it just turns people into mostly-asymptomatic spreaders. It is, in other words, leaky. And there's a funny thing about leaky vaccines.
They tend to make diseases more transmissible and more deadly over time.
The two articles I've just linked there are about Marek's Disease, a type of lethal herpes in chickens. The Tl;Dr goes a bit like this:
Without any intervention whatsoever, Marek's Disease will kill chickens over the course of a few months on average, and be difficult, but not necessarily impossible, to quarantine and eliminate in a coop. This was a huge deal that caused fucktillions of dollars of damage to the chicken industry in the 60's.
Lucky for the chickens and their farmers, there's a vaccine.
The thing is, it's kind of a shit vaccine. It has lots of breakthrough cases, where it only partially mitigates the disease. And it does not eliminate the spread of the disease, even among the vaccinated.
This should sound awfully familiar.
As I said, on its own, Marek's will kill chickens over the course of a few months on average. But the absolute worst cases of it will kill in the course of a few days. These 'hot' Mareks cases tend to burn themselves out in the wild, so they ultimately don't spread far.
But add in a leaky vax... Suddenly the 'slow Marek's' is entirely asymptomatic and not spreading, and/or eliminated... and the 'hot Marek's' is now taking a few months to kill, and spreading like wildfire.
And it only gets worse over time, as the Hotter variants that can make worse and worse breakthrough cases become more dominant. Pretty soon, you've got Marek's so bad that it'll basically melt your chickens from the inside out as soon as they catch a whiff of it if they're unvaccinated, and they need the vaccine just to have a chance at survival.
These days, if you want to raise chickens at anything close to a commercial level, you need to have them vaccinated against Marek's. Otherwise, once one chicken catches it, your entire farm will have it, and you will not be able to see it coming any time you import chickens from elsewhere, because they will probably be vaccinated and may very well be asymptomatic spreaders.
----Not a Sword, But a Chain: The Jab, and Life as a Subscription Service----
So, we have a disease with a very high mutation rate, and it has a nasty habit of creating breakthrough cases even in those who've taken the jab. The disease even has an initially low fatality rate and a long incubation period, so it can become endemic world wide, right before we start panic-jabbing the masses in an attempt to eliminate it.
How long do you think it might take, how many Variants do you think there will be, before the breakthrough cases become say, as bad as a pneumatic flu to the jabbed, and incredibly more lethal than that to the unjabbed? How long do you think it might be, before this becomes a human Marek's disease?
Well, it doesn't stop there.
The jab is even shittier than the Marek's Vaccine, because it does not last forever. Eight months seems to be the accepted dogma for now, but Israel (yes, I know, but consider again that this is not a weapon of elimination, but of enslavement.) is claiming that its effectiveness falls to 16% after just 5 months
Consider what that might mean, should the selection pressures go the path of Marek's disease. The jab would literally become essential to simply staying alive. And unlike the chickens, you would be doling out for a new one twice a year.
The Proverbial They would be selecting for a world where their staunchest critics, their most ardent skeptics, are gradually and horrifically picked off by ever increasingly deadly waves of 'Seasonal Variants' while their most indoctrinated sheep get to smugly continue their gelded existence, with just enough death among them to keep them fearful and compliant at the utmost maximum.
Now that sounds like a scheme I can see the Great and Shady Cabal drooling over.
And I imagine that like any essential good, it will only become more expensive over time. Suppose that in the increasing chaos and panic, Pfizer begins claiming they can't maintain their supply and factory lines, and the price goes up, and up, and up. You'll be putting more and more money in their pocket, twice a year, every year, because the only other option is too horrific to imagine.
Hell, if you want to get properly Orwellian in here, suppose the government steps in with their ever-so-kind assistance and gets people hooked onto their teats, dependent on government aid to keep up with medicine that's otherwise impossible to obtain by all but the most absurdly wealthy.
Suppose that those who spread 'Disinformation' or 'Sedition' were denied this aid.
It would be worse than just a boot stamping on the face of humanity forever. It would be humanity begging to keep the boot there, because they need it to survive.
----Conclusion----
If the jab is a weapon, I think it is most likely a weapon of this nature; not a sword that slays, but a chain that binds. Not a culling of the sheep, but a fence around them. Not an iron gauntlet that crushes, but a velvet muzzle, which its victims beg to wear.
How do you defeat such a weapon?
I would look toward what is currently being suppressed and mocked by those on the other side.
They want everyone to be jabbed, so that the selection pressure can be maximized in a Marek's-like direction. So do not be jabbed.
They want to suppress, bury, and mock information about ways to treat covid symptoms and get through the disease alive. So spread every valid piece of information you can about things like Ivermectin.
They want to create a narrative where natural immunity is insufficient and inferior compared to their jab. So consider getting yourself some natural immunity, and certainly work to counter their disinfo. The childish part of me wants to say "Do your part; Go lick a covid patient today!"
They want you to fear. So be unafraid.
They want you to comply. So resist.
Til the very last breath, whether yours or theirs.
The Marek's scenario would be an apocalypse level event. They've acknowledged that the boosters have a diminishing effect, and they wouldn't be able to keep up with new mutations. Even the vaxxmaxxers would be wiped out in the end, assuming supply chains haven't sufficiently degraded that everyone starves first.
Suppose that the diminishing effect isn't because of new mutations, but is a consequence of the jab's mechanism. Maybe this type of treatment simply doesn't stay active in the body for very long.
If we can find evidence of this being the case, it would be evidence for a Marek's scenario being the plan.
I wasn't implying mutations are responsible for the diminishing effect. A combination of the ever decreasing protection period combined with the mutation rate of coronaviruses means that eventually they wouldn't be able to keep up. It's a true world ender, unless they have some super secret cure already reserved for the uber elites.
Spez: The elites are more degraded than ever and progressives have never been able to realize their utopian plans. They are too incompetent to not wipe out the world if the Marek's scenario is the plan.
Alright, then I suppose it depends on if repeated boosters really do become less effective over time. Right now I'm not sure if we've got the data to say that, since we're only just now being talked into the first round of boosters. They don't even have longitudinal studies of the baseline jab, let alone the effectiveness of boosters.
Diminishing effect eh? Sounds like Ambrosia.
God, I hope so.
But aren't the politicians using way too much force to simply be seen as doing something? The leftward masses are conditioned to clap for the simplest of actions, so long as it's showy.
Don't you think they'd be more or less happy if the Biden admin just, I dunno... used its force to ensure the jab remains free (and crowed about it much louder.) and does something like mandating free mask boxes in public places, so people can muzzle up easier, or something equally banal like that?
They seem to be pushing far too hard for it to just be clout-mongering. Especially when it's beginning to have even the people on their own side saying that it's going too far, from time to time.
Yeah, stupidity and evil often go hand in hand.
And sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice.
Sadly true.
Viruses adapt to their environment. Adapting to a mostly vaxxed population would not necessarily make the virus more deadly to the unvaxxed. The smart(ish) thing is if they create a vaccine for delta is to only give it to the old and people with serious comorbidities so there won't be a large enough population to push further adaptation. But they won't because they are already pushing the "the unvaxxed drive mutation (wtf)" so they will tell everyone to get the delta vax and then some previously minor variant that is well adapted to the vaccine will rise to replace it and on and on forever.
I think the Delta panic is a combination of them jumping the gun, and needing to keep the fear factor in place against people getting tired of the initial covid panic.
I think that the Authorities were listening to their science advisors about how this whole thing could work, but fundamentally misunderstood that variants aren't all going to move in the same direction, and not all at the same pace. As soon as they saw a variant becoming dominant just as jabs were becoming wide spread, they threw up their hands and said "JACKPOT!" and started going all-in on the fearmongering, before they knew for sure whether it was what they wanted.
It'd be driven by one part over-eagerness and one part them starting to panic because people were grumbling about lockdowns and masks and all that, and states were starting to push to go back to normal.
The people that run Israel are demon worshippers that get off on human sacrifice. Especially the pure and the innocent.
Why would they want to kill their own people? Random Israeli citizens aren't "their people." They're as much of chattel as the goys in the US. Only those in on the cult are afforded any real protection, and even then it's simply an "honor among thieves" type of deal. We won't fuck with your evil plot if you don't fuck with ours.
You've also got a bit of an incorrect idea about what the "vaccine" is and what it does.
There's no such thing as a "breakthrough case." The injection does fuck all to prevent infection. In fact, in many cases it prevents the body from being able to even create antibodies against corona-type viruses.
What it does is infect the body with a modified retrovirus that then infests throughout the host and propagates into areas most receptive to what the virus is encoding local cells to make, namely the spike protein. So it gathers most heavily in the lungs and the reproductive system.
Really the whole thing is a mass form of population control meant to thin the herd while allowing the shepherds to centralize their control.
Why the hard pivot into suddenly mandating it and going for vax-passports and the like once they are in power, then?
I'm not entirely sure there are two factions in the government. At least not effectively. They seem to be split between the rabid anti-populist globalists, and the extremely rabid anti-populist globalists.
Besides, wouldn't the antichrist/moloch/the satanic cabal be clever enough to make a plan that eliminates their enemies while implementing the Mark of the Beast? Like a Marek's scenario very well might?
Ah, but, in the Marek's scenario, they do have a pretty high population still. Vaccination rate is what, 44-ish percent, worldwide right now? Even if it was halved again in the chaos that followed a die-off, you'd still have more than a billion people kicking around. Certainly enough to maintain high-tech society, especially since it's the more developed nations that seem to be leaning toward heavy vaccination.
Significantly lowered, with the population cowed and controlled into keeping it low, and the main people killed off being the enemies of their policies.
Also, mostly apropo of nothing... I was knocking it around in my head while I was making dinner for my family just now, and don't you think Marek's kind of sounds like Moloch's? Coincidence? Providence? Stupid? (Yes)
I definitely think you're on to something.
It's obvious this agenda is sinister beyond just greed, the cover-ups of the high-death rates and SAEs (and the fact the Big Pharma were well aware of these issues beforehand) lends itself to some really shady end.
But to what end is the big question?
Marek's sounds plausible, and most people have figured that the boosters as a vaccination as a service model (VaaS) is part of that plan, but I think most of us are still a little murky on the endgame.
I think RedPillComedy is right insofar that regardless of their intentions it's not all that sensible.
As a greed tactic too many people are dying off to these jabs and developing long term side effects that increase mortality in the short term; the more booster shots people get the higher the risk of mortality from the messengers causing clots in your bloodstream. Again, as a greed plan it doesn't make sense, as a de-population plan it is definitely sensible, but you bring up a good counterpoint: most of the people adopting the vax and the VaaS mentality are Leftist sheep.
The enemy of the Powers That Be are against the vax and VaaS. So as a de-population tactic it's targeting the wrong people.
But at the same time, if the Marek's end-game is the purpose, then maybe it is targeting the right people just in a 4D chess sort of way. But that's assuming that the people who aren't vaxxed won't naturally build immunity to the variants (and so far, it looks like the unvaxxed have pretty good natural immunity to the variants, whereas the vaxxed are dropping hard to the mutations).
It's obvious there's a long game in play here, I'm just having a hard time deciphering some of the minutiae. De-population definitely seems to be on the table, but which way they're attempting to go with it is hard to pinpoint exactly. Constantly keeping the sheeple on boosters will keep killing off large portions of them the more the messengers travel, and for a lot of women it will cause fertility issues, so breeding more sheeple won't be possible in the long term.
Maybe that's the whole point? To breed out the sheeple and import third-worlders as the new base demographic? But what happens when the third-world migrants/invaders refuse the vax? Or is that what the vax mandates are for? Keep breeding out the national citizens in first-world countries with the vax/Marek's and then importing third-worlders as the new slave class?
I haven't, actually. Or at least, I've never been noticeably sick since the panic started, and I was til recently working a job that had me tested twice weekly and never posted positive....
So call it 50/50, really :P