This is correct. Deny their authority outright. However, this will require force and a unified front of people in the thousands. The best way to achieve this is in a religous community. Reality is unintentioally ironic sometimes.
If there's one thing the past two years have taught me, it's that society needs religion. Take it away, and people replace it with something else: something much more sinister, and with no unifying moral code.
I believe that you should qualify for an exemption because you have a deeply held conviction against getting the vaccine. I believe that freedom of religion should be that broad.
I'm not saying it will, but I'm saying it should. And the fact that it doesn't is evidence that our system is broken.
Freedom of religion only applies to things the government doesn't really, really want you to do. No joke. The verbiage the courts use is that it needs to be a "compelling governmental action." Like, wtf?
How about stop applying for exemptions? All you're doing is conceding that the government has a right to do this in the first place.
I'm an atheist and I'm perfectly healthy. I don't qualify for any religious or medical exemptions.
I qualify for the You-Can-Inject-My-Cold-Dead-Corpse exemption.
This is correct. Deny their authority outright. However, this will require force and a unified front of people in the thousands. The best way to achieve this is in a religous community. Reality is unintentioally ironic sometimes.
If there's one thing the past two years have taught me, it's that society needs religion. Take it away, and people replace it with something else: something much more sinister, and with no unifying moral code.
I believe that you should qualify for an exemption because you have a deeply held conviction against getting the vaccine. I believe that freedom of religion should be that broad.
Let me know when you figure out how to make that fly with an employer, because I would very much like to continue being employed in the near future.
I'm not saying it will, but I'm saying it should. And the fact that it doesn't is evidence that our system is broken.
Freedom of religion only applies to things the government doesn't really, really want you to do. No joke. The verbiage the courts use is that it needs to be a "compelling governmental action." Like, wtf?
Correct! Sincerely held belief should not have to be religious. Especially when we're talking about an EUA