I want Nuremberg Trials 2.0 for their crimes against humanity and a new system that gives them the worst of both worlds. No voice, but they have to pay tax and earn a living without leeching off a man.
It's deserved for what they attempted to do to us all.
Per Schopenhauer, retributive harm is not justice.
Justice is only ethical when it is focused on the future, not the past, with the aim of deterrence. There is no cosmic scale that is set out of balance and made right by revenge. Revenge is always morally indefensible.
I don't buy it when people claim to be vicariously angry.
I'll say it straight up, I despise women and want to hard revert society to 18th century legal patriarchy.
I think you want the same. It offends me when you claim to have nobler objectives that in my view do not explain your anger.
Vis a vi, you want what I want, but I'm honest about it.
I want Nuremberg Trials 2.0 for their crimes against humanity and a new system that gives them the worst of both worlds. No voice, but they have to pay tax and earn a living without leeching off a man.
It's deserved for what they attempted to do to us all.
Y'see, now when you say that, I believe you mean it.
You're wrong tho, it's unwise to involve women in matters of money at all. The historical 'lifetime dependent" setup was far more practical.
It might be unwise, but if it inflicts misery on them, it's justice for what they did to everyone else.
I'm fine with handling whatever consequences come with forcing them into the workforce and cutting them off welfare permanently.
Per Schopenhauer, retributive harm is not justice.
Justice is only ethical when it is focused on the future, not the past, with the aim of deterrence. There is no cosmic scale that is set out of balance and made right by revenge. Revenge is always morally indefensible.