Per Schopenhauer, retributive harm is not justice.
Justice is only ethical when it is focused on the future, not the past, with the aim of deterrence. There is no cosmic scale that is set out of balance and made right by revenge. Revenge is always morally indefensible.
Y'see, now when you say that, I believe you mean it.
You're wrong tho, it's unwise to involve women in matters of money at all. The historical 'lifetime dependent" setup was far more practical.
It might be unwise, but if it inflicts misery on them, it's justice for what they did to everyone else.
I'm fine with handling whatever consequences come with forcing them into the workforce and cutting them off welfare permanently.
Per Schopenhauer, retributive harm is not justice.
Justice is only ethical when it is focused on the future, not the past, with the aim of deterrence. There is no cosmic scale that is set out of balance and made right by revenge. Revenge is always morally indefensible.
I really don't care what intellectuals think, I am a strong believer in revenge.
Moral high ground gets torn down first.
Your actions (or rather your lack of actions) makes me doubt that.
Because you haven't thrown away your life for revenge, I think you have a higher aim.