For some I know it stems from a deep distrust of media and federal institutions. The Ivermectin is easy to acquire (sometimes with zinc), and seems anti-establishment, so they get that.
I'm uncertain how effective it is, as I distrust the same institutions trying to discredit it, so it might very well be, but at the same time am skeptical. But I don't think it is harmful either. So whatever. I beat COVID without it just fine, and Joe Rogan likely would have as well, 99%+ survival rate right?
It is hilarious seeing people on Reddit say he got through it so well because he's "rich" and can afford the "rich people medicine" that apparently only the .01% are hoarding to themselves.
They refuse to acknowledge it has any benefit, they don't care if it is part of a regiment or not all they care about is "my lords tell me to hate it so I hate it."
Japanese medical chairman doubles down on ivermectin support after early calls went ignored
He added that while ivermectin’s established effectiveness is increasingly clear, the U.S. company that manufactures the drug, Merck & Co., Inc., have currently limited distribution
I assumed the poor people in Africa and other countries (not India) where the difference was measured were only taking Ivermectin. I suppose it's possible they're taking other stuff with it. More studies are needed. Just because the FLCCC has come up with a robust comprehensive plan doesn't mean they won't later find out that half of that stuff isn't directly correlated to positive outcomes.
People always go with the cheap one-pill solution if they can.
For some I know it stems from a deep distrust of media and federal institutions. The Ivermectin is easy to acquire (sometimes with zinc), and seems anti-establishment, so they get that.
I'm uncertain how effective it is, as I distrust the same institutions trying to discredit it, so it might very well be, but at the same time am skeptical. But I don't think it is harmful either. So whatever. I beat COVID without it just fine, and Joe Rogan likely would have as well, 99%+ survival rate right?
It is hilarious seeing people on Reddit say he got through it so well because he's "rich" and can afford the "rich people medicine" that apparently only the .01% are hoarding to themselves.
They refuse to acknowledge it has any benefit, they don't care if it is part of a regiment or not all they care about is "my lords tell me to hate it so I hate it."
Japanese medical chairman doubles down on ivermectin support after early calls went ignored
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/japanese-medical-chairman-doubles-down-on-ivermectin-support/
It offers the promise of a "good enough" solution. It isn't the vaccine.
That is enough for a lot of people.
I assumed the poor people in Africa and other countries (not India) where the difference was measured were only taking Ivermectin. I suppose it's possible they're taking other stuff with it. More studies are needed. Just because the FLCCC has come up with a robust comprehensive plan doesn't mean they won't later find out that half of that stuff isn't directly correlated to positive outcomes.
People always go with the cheap one-pill solution if they can.