What's your point?
Using an argument from authority based off the opinions of one person, don't invalidate the views of another.
Especially when many of those opinions are strawmans or reductio ad absurdum.
I'm not telling you what to believe; form your own conclusions based off of your own beliefs.
I believe that page is just as speculative and and opinionated as those who believe otherwise.
In essence, much of it is offering different interpretations of events.
At no point am I saying they're responsible for what happened, but I would suggest that very likely at least had some foreknowledge of what would occur.
There's a memorandum not mentioned in your link sent to the 9/11 commission by a man named Gerald Shea that would suggest the same as well.
https://www.scribd.com/document/66321077/Gerald-Shea-Memo-to-the-9-11-Commission
Given Israel's history, (as briefly shown in that history graphic) it would be difficult to believe they'd be honest about involvement in such things. I'm of the belief that they did know beforehand.
A lot of the "debunk" relies on the alphabet agencies being forthcoming and truthful about what they tell people. Given what we've seen the last few years from these same groups, their credibility in my eyes is complete trash. They're in the business of lies and cover-ups.
Attributing their behavior to "immature conduct," as the official belief goes, is silly to me. I also don't buy the excuse of "now they know what we go through." People don't celebrate other people's misery because it validates their own.
Although I've seen the page you linked before, and it provides a nice aggregation of information, the interpretations by whomever is writing the opinions are just strawmans, arguments from authority, and reductio ad absurdum.I'll also admit that I don't like how it tries to paint them as victims at the end. To me that comes across as tryhard.
I'm skeptical by nature. For better or worse.
It's fine that we disagree, though. I certainly wouldn't say you're wrong for believing what you do, I just personally don't buy into it as well.
Sadly, the entire event has been tarnished forever by retards spouting absolutely insane crap very loudly. Silly crap like mini-nukes, direct energy weapons, thermite paint, and even holograms only served to discredit anyone seeking actual answers. Maybe that was intentional?
Anyone, best of luck to you out there, man. Stay safe and healthy.
At no point am I saying they're responsible for what happened, but I would suggest that very likely at least had some foreknowledge of what would occur.
A lot of the "debunk" relies on the alphabet agencies being forthcoming and truthful about what they tell people. Given what we've seen the last few years from these same groups, their credibility in my eyes is complete trash.
Why should I trust an antisemite that came up with this instead, when all the evidence, not even coming from intelligence agencies suggests foreknowledge is bunk?
I'm skeptical by nature. For better or worse.
A skeptic doesn't believe in conspiracy theories.
Anyone, best of luck to you out there, man. Stay safe and healthy.
That is a nice change of pace in comparison to the others who have a tendency to subscribe to this nonsense. So, thank you, the feeling is mutual, stay safe and healthy.
http://www.911myths.com/index.php?title=Dancing_Israelis
What's your point?
Using an argument from authority based off the opinions of one person, don't invalidate the views of another.
Especially when many of those opinions are strawmans or reductio ad absurdum.
I'm not telling you what to believe; form your own conclusions based off of your own beliefs.
Errm... Those are facts from multiple people, and multiple sources.
Take it as you want. I consider the claim "Dacing Israeli" and the conspiracy theory that revolves around it debunked.
I believe that page is just as speculative and and opinionated as those who believe otherwise.
In essence, much of it is offering different interpretations of events.
At no point am I saying they're responsible for what happened, but I would suggest that very likely at least had some foreknowledge of what would occur.
There's a memorandum not mentioned in your link sent to the 9/11 commission by a man named Gerald Shea that would suggest the same as well. https://www.scribd.com/document/66321077/Gerald-Shea-Memo-to-the-9-11-Commission
Given Israel's history, (as briefly shown in that history graphic) it would be difficult to believe they'd be honest about involvement in such things. I'm of the belief that they did know beforehand.
A lot of the "debunk" relies on the alphabet agencies being forthcoming and truthful about what they tell people. Given what we've seen the last few years from these same groups, their credibility in my eyes is complete trash. They're in the business of lies and cover-ups.
Attributing their behavior to "immature conduct," as the official belief goes, is silly to me. I also don't buy the excuse of "now they know what we go through." People don't celebrate other people's misery because it validates their own.
Although I've seen the page you linked before, and it provides a nice aggregation of information, the interpretations by whomever is writing the opinions are just strawmans, arguments from authority, and reductio ad absurdum.I'll also admit that I don't like how it tries to paint them as victims at the end. To me that comes across as tryhard.
I'm skeptical by nature. For better or worse.
It's fine that we disagree, though. I certainly wouldn't say you're wrong for believing what you do, I just personally don't buy into it as well.
Sadly, the entire event has been tarnished forever by retards spouting absolutely insane crap very loudly. Silly crap like mini-nukes, direct energy weapons, thermite paint, and even holograms only served to discredit anyone seeking actual answers. Maybe that was intentional?
Anyone, best of luck to you out there, man. Stay safe and healthy.
No foreknowledge
https://web.archive.org/web/20021003225412/http:/abcnews.go.com/sections/2020/DailyNews/2020_whitevan_020621.html
Why should I trust an antisemite that came up with this instead, when all the evidence, not even coming from intelligence agencies suggests foreknowledge is bunk?
A skeptic doesn't believe in conspiracy theories.
That is a nice change of pace in comparison to the others who have a tendency to subscribe to this nonsense. So, thank you, the feeling is mutual, stay safe and healthy.