Pretty sure they have a much better grasp of what took place than most people do, considering their reputations are on the line by speaking out.
No one said you had to agree.
I'm not willing to base the entire belief that it was "severely damaged" on two individual pictures of the SW corner. That's fine if you are. No one is forcing you to think anything.
Read their report.
These are some of the brightest engineers in the world from two different schools collaborating. You're sorely mistaken.
I decide to skim through the report.
It's pretty bad that they mention almost no damage to the structure of the building at all, despite major structural damage to the building.
I suspect that that wrong assumption probably has an effect on their conclusions.
Pretty sure they have a much better grasp of what took place than most people do, considering their reputations are on the line by speaking out.
No one said you had to agree.
I'm not willing to base the entire belief that it was "severely damaged" on two individual pictures of the SW corner. That's fine if you are. No one is forcing you to think anything.
"top minds"
Not an argument. Discredit the merit of what's they're discussing, not make pointless ad hominems because you feel it somehow validates your opinion.