The actual reasons of the higher ups are irrelevant, the lie they were sold on was protecting women. Even now, they talk about how the US pullout will affect women's rights in Afghanistan like people should actually fucking care.
I wonder how many less men would have died if women tried to actually do something under occupation rather than sell out their allies, families and country for their own gain.
Oh yeah, the Titanic. And every other disaster ever. And every armed conflict ever. And every hostage situation ever.
And yes, you're right - the Titanic isn't why women have what they have. Now how about you go to to your kitchen, turn on the light and get a glass of water - and have a think about the gigantic effort that had to go into "haha I flip switch, lightbulb go bzzz and faucet go brrr".
You're welcome, sincerely the generations of men who wrecked their backs building it just so you can be an ungrateful, obnoxious twat and feel euphoric arguing semantics.
I don't believe it to be melodramatic. Men sacrificed so much for women to have what they have, with very little to no good coming out of it.
In return, they push to mandate something they know will harm us.
If their legal status was changed, companies wouldn't keep sliding towards the left out of fear of them.
Like what? What did they sacrifice for women as a class?
Their lives for a start, how many men died for "women's rights" abroad? Actually, how many men died because women wouldn't fight for their country?
Their children's futures, which are now controlled by women and granted based on their gender and loyalty to the cause.
God only knows how much in tax money was burned in tribute to our "superiors".
Zero. They died for Realpolitik.
A negative number, as many more would have died if they also had to take care of women incompetently fighting.
The actual reasons of the higher ups are irrelevant, the lie they were sold on was protecting women. Even now, they talk about how the US pullout will affect women's rights in Afghanistan like people should actually fucking care.
I wonder how many less men would have died if women tried to actually do something under occupation rather than sell out their allies, families and country for their own gain.
... you do realize the consequence of "women and children first" is "men last", right?
I meant this specifically.
I am pretty sure that the Titanic is not the reason why women 'have what they have'.
Parenthetically, the very classy 'suffragists' downplayed the sacrifice made by these men on the Titanic.
Oh yeah, the Titanic. And every other disaster ever. And every armed conflict ever. And every hostage situation ever.
And yes, you're right - the Titanic isn't why women have what they have. Now how about you go to to your kitchen, turn on the light and get a glass of water - and have a think about the gigantic effort that had to go into "haha I flip switch, lightbulb go bzzz and faucet go brrr".
You're welcome, sincerely the generations of men who wrecked their backs building it just so you can be an ungrateful, obnoxious twat and feel euphoric arguing semantics.