Oh yeah, the Titanic. And every other disaster ever. And every armed conflict ever. And every hostage situation ever.
And yes, you're right - the Titanic isn't why women have what they have. Now how about you go to to your kitchen, turn on the light and get a glass of water - and have a think about the gigantic effort that had to go into "haha I flip switch, lightbulb go bzzz and faucet go brrr".
You're welcome, sincerely the generations of men who wrecked their backs building it just so you can be an ungrateful, obnoxious twat and feel euphoric arguing semantics.
Oh yeah, the Titanic. And every other disaster ever. And every armed conflict ever. And every hostage situation ever.
Armed conflicts were hardly fought 'for women to have what they have'...
You're welcome, sincerely the generations of men who wrecked their backs building it just so you can be an ungrateful, obnoxious twat and feel euphoric arguing semantics.
Wait, you think I'm a woman? None of this was your doing, by the way. People did not invent the light-switch or the tap for women. So the claim was nonsense.
I mean yeah, he's a midwit on a good day and doesn't hesitate to sacrifice an entire community (see his actions during the early days of r/kia2), but whenever he and theimpossible1 encounter eachother in a thread it's like something in his brain short-circuits and he defaults to a level of mental gymnastics that would make an r/politics mod proud. Doesn't matter what exactly theimpossible1 says or what the topic of the discussion is, aov goes full Dalek and just HAS to... I don't know, exterminate theimpossible1's very existence I guess?
... you do realize the consequence of "women and children first" is "men last", right?
I meant this specifically.
I am pretty sure that the Titanic is not the reason why women 'have what they have'.
Parenthetically, the very classy 'suffragists' downplayed the sacrifice made by these men on the Titanic.
Oh yeah, the Titanic. And every other disaster ever. And every armed conflict ever. And every hostage situation ever.
And yes, you're right - the Titanic isn't why women have what they have. Now how about you go to to your kitchen, turn on the light and get a glass of water - and have a think about the gigantic effort that had to go into "haha I flip switch, lightbulb go bzzz and faucet go brrr".
You're welcome, sincerely the generations of men who wrecked their backs building it just so you can be an ungrateful, obnoxious twat and feel euphoric arguing semantics.
Armed conflicts were hardly fought 'for women to have what they have'...
Wait, you think I'm a woman? None of this was your doing, by the way. People did not invent the light-switch or the tap for women. So the claim was nonsense.
The lady doth ree too much, methinks.
It's funny with aov...
I mean yeah, he's a midwit on a good day and doesn't hesitate to sacrifice an entire community (see his actions during the early days of r/kia2), but whenever he and theimpossible1 encounter eachother in a thread it's like something in his brain short-circuits and he defaults to a level of mental gymnastics that would make an r/politics mod proud. Doesn't matter what exactly theimpossible1 says or what the topic of the discussion is, aov goes full Dalek and just HAS to... I don't know, exterminate theimpossible1's very existence I guess?